Has anyone ever figured out just exactly what movie Carl Denham (Robert Armstrong) was planning on making in the original, and awesomely great, King Kong (1933)? I love the movie and, honestly, a part of its appeal is trying to decipher from the available evidence just what kind of movie Denham planned on making anyway.Let's see, first we've got his reputation. It most definitely precedes him as an adventurous filmmaker who films dangerous animals, and dangerous situations, in the wild. Kong was made in 1933 and Trader Horn was still pretty fresh out of the hit factory from 1931 so I'm thinking he does movies like that. Also, as far as his reputation goes, he wastes little time discussing anything that doesn't concern how absolutely fucking awesome, courageous and big-cocked he is. Yeah, he's pretty high on himself.
Second, he just has to have an actress. This seems very important to him. When the actress he has backs out (or so he says), he goes to skid row to exploit - I mean - find a young woman, Ann Darrow (Fay Wray) to fill the role.
Third, we've got the island. He knows about it and Kong and judging from the gas bombs he brought he knows about how big Kong is, too.
So, he makes adventures and his alleged movie involves a female character and Kong. Now, we know how these elements come together in the movie we're watching, but Carl is utterly taken by surprise by this outcome (in which Ann is ritualistically offered up to Kong who takes her to be his own). He didn't see that coming at all so clearly that wasn't his plan for the movie. Which leaves us with the footage he shoots of Ann on the ship pretending to see something horrifying and screaming and the footage he gets of the Kong Wedding Rites before he and his ship mates are discovered.
To make matters worse, once he captures Kong he stops filming altogether. Rather than shoot a movie he simply puts Kong on some kind of Vaudeville/Hollywood Revue Mash-Up Tour. That, as we all know, ends in what can only be described as both a categorically and definitionally epic fail. When your revue ends up causing city-wide panic and the destruction of entire sections of subway line, brother, you done fucked up bad.
And all of this, surely, cost a fortune. So, what can we conclude? Well, I'll be honest: I think Carl Denham is a total fraud, a pipe dreamer of the pipe dreamers, a director who sells you a river and delivers a wet rag. See, I think that footage he shot was the movie. I think that's all he had. Seriously. You know that whole rigmarole he gives Ann on the ship about how he had to fire his last cameraman because he was afraid of a charging rhino? That's pretty convenient, isn't it? Sure, that's why he has no cameraman. He had to fire him because he was a coward. I mean, he's this great filmmaker but he's got no crew. None! No actors, no cameraman, no nobody. He's by himself.
"Oh well, the boom operator was lily-livered and the sound man, uh, he was, uh, really stupid. Yeah, he was stupid! So I fired him, too. And the actors, um, well, uh, they all quit on me..." And so on. Carl keeps inventing reasons why no one is working with him, and they're all, coincidentally, centered around the fact that nobody is as bloody goddamned awesome as he!
Meanwhile, back in Hollywood, the financier he conned into backing the whole damn thing is learning a lesson both valuable and heartbreakingly difficult. I imagine the conversation with his lackey going something like this:
Lackey: "Sir, the Denham movie's finished. He sent us the completed reel."
Financier: "You mean, reels, plural."
Lackey: "No sir, reel. It's four minutes long."
Financier: [stares dumbfounded, struggles for words] "Wh... what is it?"
Lackey: "It appears to be two or so minutes of an unidentified woman screaming on a ship and a lot of people in tribal garb dancing around a woman on a platform."
Financier: [blinks, stares into space momentarily before speaking again] "So... we've still got a lot of money left over then, right?"
Lackey: "No sir. He went 580 percent over-budget."
Financier: "..."
Lackey: "Sir?"
Financier: [stares blankly out window and slowly, almost imperceptibly, utters...] "fuuuuuuuuuck."
Lesson learned, the hard way. When Carl Denham shows up at your door and says he has a plan, run. He may promise you riches, fame and glory but all you'll end up with is a destroyed city, a tarnished reputation and stock footage even Ed Wood couldn't use. When your dreams lay shattered on the floor, and Denham was involved, you can be sure of one thing: It was bullshit killed the beast.

22 comments:
Great stuff, Greg. Next, you need to turn your attention to figuring out the story of the second show Astaire and co. put on in "The Bandwagon" (the one's that's not "Faust")
Excellent! This could become a new feature: Cinema Detectives. I'm on the case!
Excellent, and when you are through with this, a full reading of Norma Desmond's "Salome" script from "Sunset Blvd" is in order.
Cinema Detectives! I love it.
Pax - Or what film did Norma think was being made when the press arrived after she shot Joe? Sure, she was ready for her closeup, but for what movie?!
Movie Snob, thanks to Bob Westal's initial comment, I'm seriously considering making this a regular feature. In fact, I will!
Greg, well Max told her that the camera's had arrived, and if memory serves, Norma was in some deluded state that she was filming Salome's decent into the palace...which of course overwhelms her and causes her to make her speech about never leaving her audience alone again...
I think I just found my first Junior Cinema Detective, Pax! You're "L'il Movie Gumshoe" patch is in the mail!
This is hilarious! I've always seen Denham's film-within-a-film as a metacinematic reflection on Cooper & Schoedsack themselves, how THEY (especially Cooper) were courageous and big-cocked and willing to put everyone in danger - as indeed they had on their earlier documentary Grass.
But I like your interpretation, too. This isn't really a mystery, but along the lines of this Cinema Detective idea: I've always felt that Jonathan Shields' prestige picture The Faraway Mountain in The Bad and the Beautiful would turn out to be an awful, unwatchably boring movie. Far less interesting than The Doom of the Cat Men.
"oh no..it wasn't the airplanes..it was BULLSHIT killed the beast"
Is Denham alluding to the fact that he can't keep male actors for very long too when he tells Driscoll "I've never known it to fail.Tuff mug like you gets one look at a pretty face and BANG he cracks up and goes sappy!"?
lol..THe Faraway Mountain sounds SO-I'm gonna skip this picture!
Andreas, I've always harbored a small fascination for the "movie within the movie." Most of them seem so unlike anything anyone would want to see and I have a theory on that. I think this is done on purpose so no one in the audience is tempted at any point to think, "Boy, I'd rather be watching that movie than this one!" Seriously, I think that's a part of it. The last thing you want is for your audience to start wishing your movie would end and the made-up one would start.
Christopher, Denham's got an excuse for why everyone has abandoned him. If he didn't cast an actress he'd say, "Never fails. The actor can't concentrate because all he can think about is beautiful women, since there are none around."
heh..I always thought it was funny in SUNSET BLVD that DeMille nixed Norma's SALOME script when it has DeMille written all over it and there he is making Samson and Delilah!
Yeah, like DeMille would never make something like that. I've thought the same thing.
No need to overstate, Greg. Ed Wood WOULD TOO have used the Kong footage!
I guess if he could find a way to use stampeding buffalo then, yeah, he'd totally use the Kong footage. Of course, saying "stock footage that even Ed Wood would use" may be even more damning to Carl Denham's reputation.
I don't know if this counts, but do you remember that episode of I LOVE LUCY where Lucy was writing a novel featuring thinly-disguised and unflattering characters based on Ethel, Fred and Ricky? Those three get wind of it, and go scrambling through the apartment looking for the manuscript, which Lucy has stashed in sections all over. By the time they've unearthed all the sections and put them all together, they've amassed what looks to be about 20 pages. What the hell kind of novel is that?? It's like the whole thing was just a scam the goal of which was to make Ricky, Fred and Ethel mad at Lucy. As if they needed any more reasons!
I imagine twenty pages is about what Lucy would turn out and even assume that was the proper length for a novel. That's why she always had 'splaining to do.
I'm going to start investigating all of these for this series, from Bob's suggestion at the top right on down to this one.
I was always curious about the dramatic arc of "Ants In Your Pants of 1939."
Now there's a movie title! And let's not forget So Long Sarong and Hey Hey in the Hayloft. I've always wanted to see just how bad Sullivan's O, Brother, Where Art Thou? would have been had he made it.
My favorite lists of credits for a director is still Felix Farmer's (Richard Mulligan) from S.O.B.:
Cyclone City, Dream Angel, Hell-bent for Texas, Love on a Pogo Stick, Tall Man from Tennessee, Chicken at the Wheel, Sea Dog, Invasion of the Pickle People, Odyssey of Pain, Pagan Plunder and, of course, the movie that sets the whole story in motion, Night Wind.
My grandfather told me Carl Denham once paid him five dollars to strangle a prostitute while he cranked away. I always assumed Grandpa meant Denham was filming... but now I wonder.
I don't know, Arbo. It's kind of hard to believe, don't you think? I mean, five dollars? From Denham?
Post a Comment