Monday, October 25, 2010

Not Quite the Last Man on Earth

I love the narrative idea of someone being the last person on earth or, at the very least, a last group of survivors, holed up and fighting off the inevitable. For instance, I love the story of the Richard Matheson book I Am Legend, and like the Vincent Price (Last Man on Earth) and Charlton Heston (The Omega Man) adaptations very much. But I don't love them, and the reason I don't love them is because last-man-on-earth scenarios almost never travel down the road I want them to. Oh sure, I like those movies on their own terms but, for me, there's still something missing, and that something is simplicity.

You see, my biggest problem with end-of-the-world scenarios is their complexity, which I would say is needless. The draw of watching, or being, the last man on earth is that there's no one else around! All complications, dropped. Full exploration of the character, on. This has been done a few times to semi-success, The World, the Flesh and the Devil and The Quiet Earth being the two best examples, but in both of those someone else eventually shows up, and then another. Why, oh why, can't they just make one person, man or woman, the last person on earth?! Castaway, with Tom Hanks, proved a great success at the box office by letting the audience watch one man, by himself, interact with the world around him. They gave him a volleyball to talk to, to be sure, but essentially made him the last man on earth by removing him from civilization, rather than remove civilization from where he lived. In that way, it plays like a last-man-on-earth scenario, even if it isn't one. And while that film doesn't do much for me, I like that they didn't have a woman suddenly appear from the other side of the island and then, later, another man so we could all be "enthralled" by their love triangle.

The Quiet Earth does this very thing, as does The World, the Flesh and the Devil and in that exact order. There's a last man for a third or even half of the movie before the screenwriter and director stop trusting the audience will be intelligent enough to follow this person through to their ultimate psychological demise, or victory, and introduce a woman that can become a love interest until another man pops up and becomes a rival. Excuse me one moment - yaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnn. When I'm going into a story about the entire population of the planet earth being wiped out, the last thing I want to see is a goddamn love triangle! Aren't there more interesting things to direct our focus?

So, to any screenwriter out there looking to reinvent the "Last Man on Earth" scenario for a new generation of moviegoers, give this a try:

Don't have a "last" man and hordes of zombies/vampires/infected crazies trying to kill him. That means he's not the last man.

Don't introduce a woman or man, depending on the gender and orientation of the last person, to become their love interest. Couldn't give two shits less.

Don't introduce another man or woman with a slightly sinister edge, who may or may not become the antagonist to the so-called last man.

Instead, make the last man on earth the last man on earth! Have him talk to corpses in varying stages of decay if you want to give him some company. Have him live a kingly life off of all the preserved food and material goods until, a few years down the road, even those aren't good anymore and watch him slowly become a wild man living off the land. Fuck reinventing civilization, show him becoming feral again (I'd love to explore what happens to Burgess Meredith's character in the Twilight Zone episode "Time Enough at Last" after he breaks his glasses) until the last moment when, with his death, the human race is gone. Then pull the camera back on a chimpanzee or a gorilla or hell, a cockroach for all I care, and indicate that now it's their time.

The above rules apply to end-of-the-world disaster scenarios as well. If an asteroid's going to hit, let it! If neutrinos or solar flares are going to destroy or engulf the earth, let them! Don't show me Frodo on a motorcycle climbing a mountain, Liv Tyler being told her dad's a helluva guy or some kid who has trouble making potty declare she shall no longer wear diapers. And don't destroy the world only to show some kids running around a Thomas Kinkade painting with a bunch of creepy angel-types. Show the world destroyed and when the last human's dead direct our attention to some multiplying microbes as we realize it's all going to start anew.

I just want to see a movie about human-made civilization gasping its last breath and think, done right, it could be a compelling and powerful film. The earth itself has been wiped out before (When Worlds Collide, The Martian Chronicles, Knowing) but there's always survivors starting over somewhere else, and there's nothing wrong with that, I just want the scenario explored where humanity is done, it's over and there's no turning back. And, surely, I can't be the last man on earth to want that.

27 comments:

Marilyn said...

There is one film in which life is destroyed on earth - though we don't actually see the depopulated planet - that works extremely well: On the Beach. Another end of days film that works is The Rapture.

Greg said...

I do think there are many of these movies that work well, but, for me, On the Beach is post-apocalyptic with plenty of survivors. It's implied the end is near, as I recall, but it doesn't happen in the scope of the film and with The Rapture we've got an afterlife, like Knowing, and it is crux of The Rapture to deal with philosophy, morality and theology rather than the end of humanity and what that means for the planet.

Marilyn said...

Yes, I know that these aren't last person on earth films, but as you point out, there aren't any of these films that don't cheat, and the Twilight Zone episode is really the only example, and it is more interested in irony with a suggestion of living hell. Still, I think end-is-nigh films give some idea of what might happen to the last person on earth - if we ever get one!

Greg said...

Well, if we do get one, I nominate me! And judging from the comment dearth, this is the last post on earth. Maybe vampire spammers will attack soon.

Of course, as long as I have you commenting on the post, I'm fine.

[Suddenly, Shane shows up and forms awkward triangle]

Neil Sarver said...

I love this post. I totally agree that while I love those movies, there is a cheat in sneaking in the "other" last people on earth in there. I'd like to see some people play with really making it happen.

Greg said...

Not only is it a cheat but one that I feel distracts from what could be more interesting, especially in the case of The Quiet Earth. It's the first part of the movie that's the very best part and the addition of two more people, honestly, adds nothing to the enterprise. In fact, I'd say it takes away from what could've been a fascinating study of one man losing his mind and Bruno Lawrence could've held the movie together all by himself.

Marilyn said...

Bruno Lawrence DID hold that movie together from beginning to end - one of the great cinematic performances of all time.

Tony Dayoub said...

THE WORLD, THE FLESH AND THE DEVIL is really interesting for the first 1/3 as you mention. But I've got such a crush on poor Inger Stevens that I'd have great difficulty excluding her. How would you feel about the movie if, say, it would have played out exactly the same as it already does except Stevens and Ferrer turn out to be hallucinations of Belafonte's fractured, lonely mind trying to cope. Copout?

Arbogast said...

I think you could count on one hand the number of people who could sit still for a true last-man-on-earth movie, in which the protagonist maintains a simple, elemental life as he ages and ultimately dies.

Anybody watch Life Without People? There's almost something comforting about seeing mankind's greatest monuments to himself crumble and fall.

Greg said...

Marilyn, he does hold it together, it's true and what a great performance it is.

Greg said...

Tony, I think that might work well, just with a little less of the other two. Perhaps have multiple periods of hallucination throughout the story, or make it clear from the beginning that he has invented someone to be with him and explore that.

Greg said...

I think you could count on one hand the number of people who could sit still for a true last-man-on-earth movie, in which the protagonist maintains a simple, elemental life as he ages and ultimately dies.

But that's exactly what Castaway does, without him dying. The opening is the setup, which of course could exist in a last man on earth movie too. An opening with other people before the event that makes this particular character the last man on earth. And then the end of Castaway is a quick tie-up of loose ends (his wife got remarried and he delivers the package). That's it.

The movie's popularity didn't hinge on that tie-up at the end, I assure you. That movie's popularity, and it was popular, was derived from the fact that people did want to see one man surviving, with no other interactions, and someone finally gave it to them.

For years before, and since, I'm sure writers, directors and producers have said the same thing you did, and that's wrong. I think the moviegoing public is perpetually underestimated. "No, no, there's gotta be a love interest." No, actually, there doesn't. There can just be one person. Really, there can be.

I've watched several episodes of Life Without People. I love the idea of it, I just wish they'd stop using "L'il Photoshop, Jr" for their special effects. It kind of kills the illusion they're so bad.

bill r. said...

One thing I've come to understand about Arbogast is that he really hates people.

I used to think that the appearance of the woman in I AM LEGEND (I'm thinking of the book here mainly) was a cheat, but utlimately it was all for the greater good.

Greg said...

Bill, it's true: Arbo does indeed hate humanity.

As for I am Legend, I don't really mind either. Like I said, I like the story on its own terms, I was just using it as another example. Both the Vincent Price and Chuck Heston versions are on Netflix instant so good times are to be had by all.

By all!

Even Arbogast, hater of humanity.

bill r. said...

Well, not to be all "I read books!" on you all, but I've actually never seen LAST MAN ON EARTH, and it's been ages since I last watched OMEGA MAN, but it's my understanding/memory that neither follows Matheson's original idea, and it's that idea that makes me say it was all for the greater good, because the woman makes the ending possible.

Greg said...

Why you gotta get all "I read books" on us? Anyway, even though I haven't read it, and I'm not trying to get all "I read wikipedia plot summaries" on y'all, but I do and, yes, the book story sounds sooooooo much better than the movie stories. I mean, they're similar but the "I am Legend" part never even made sense to me until I read how it's incorporated into the end.

Christopher said...

I like the idea of repopulating the earth again with Elizabeth Montomary following the big battle of the sexes..

bill r. said...

Greg - Yeah, it's a brilliant idea, one that each of the films versions has shied away from. Of course, at least OMEGA MAN and THE LAST MAN ON EARTH had the decency to change their titles, since without that ending I AM LEGEND makes no sense. But the Will Smith movie stuck with it. Of course, in that case the alternate ending, on the DVD, does use Matheson's ending. They do it badly, but they tried it (part of it -- he doesn't die, but the rest is there, in concept). Then they decided people wouldn't like it, or something, and cut it out.

Greg said...

Christopher, I love that episode of The Twilight Zone! If I had the money I'd buy every copy of TZ, Outer Limits and Thriller that's out there.

Greg said...

They do it badly, but they tried it (part of it -- he doesn't die, but the rest is there, in concept). Then they decided people wouldn't like it, or something, and cut it out.

Yes! Go Hollywood!

Arbogast said...

You know, I didn't hate humanity... 'til now.


Syckinci!

Greg said...

Sometimes, Arbogast scares me.

Arbogast said...

You needn't be afraid, Greg. It's not as if you're Bill.

bill r. said...

It's not like Greg's what now?

James said...

Wow! I totally agree with you. Someone needs to make that movie and I vote you!

Anonymous said...

I konow it's a robot, but what about Wall-E? It's a great half-film (the first half) until mankind shows up. And somehow, being so human, it/he could actually be a good example of "the last man on earth"...

Also, take a look at a great comic series, "Y, the last man on earth".

Greg said...

Those are my sentiments exactly on Wall-E. I like the first part and the video footage shown later of the President announcing that it's a lost cause was actually fairly disturbing. Then they get on the spaceship and all the usual hijinks and chases and fights commence and it lost me.