Thursday, October 28, 2010

Defending the Unknown: The Blair Witch Project

I don't need to defend The Blair Witch Project, as the film has an ample supply of supporters and the backlash against it is as old news as a Y2K story banged out on a Smith Corona for next weeks' issue of George. I also don't need to go into the plot (3 teen/twenty somethings, woods, cameras, lost... you get it) or remind anyone that you don't ever see a witch in it. I don't need to go into the maddening cracks in common sense that the characters demonstrate (they pass the same stream twice and don't immediately think, "Let's just follow the stream.") or the acts of mindless stupidity ("Something's outside the tent. I'm going to run blindly from the tent into the night."). I don't need to because the people who didn't get that The Blair Witch Project got the fear of the unknown just right aren't going to listen anyway and I don't feel like arguing with them.

I understand movie viewers can sometimes be driven insane by some of the logical inconsistencies of a movie like this, and I sympathize because I too find myself gritting my teeth at movies that contain "Idiot Plot" elements (as described years ago by Roger Ebert, an "idiot plot" is any movie plot in which, if the characters weren't all idiots, would end in five minutes).

But...

Sometimes a movie really is going for a feeling, a sense of... something. Something intangible, something unknown. That's what The Blair Witch Project is going for, something unknown, and it succeeds mightily. But I don't bring this up to drag out another defense of the movie but to herald the unknown as a viable source of horror genre fodder that is, surprisingly, rarely used. When I say "the unknown" I don't mean supernatural or paranormal occurrences that can't be explained, like The Amityville Horror or Paranormal Activity or Burnt Offerings. I don't mean movies about unexplained occurrences where investigators have to figure out what's going on before it's too late or movies about vampires, werewolves or poltergeists. I mean the unknown. Period. As in The Blair Witch Project, where nothing is explained and nothing shown and nothing, really, even strongly hypothesized. Our characters are there, in the woods, and they feel a menace around them. And that's pretty much all we ever learn.

I know that kind of thing exists because I experienced it once myself, years ago. I was in Charleston, South Carolina, where I grew up and, bored, decided to drive up highway 17, north. Eventually I turned off onto some side roads, parked in a small open space off the shoulder and wandered into the woods of Francis Marion National Forest. I started walking into the woods, off any main trail, and continued to do so for about an hour. Eventually, I came to a clearing and if you hike a lot, and my wife and I do, you know that a clearing (a natural one) is, in many ways, a mystical place. Usually small spots where, for whatever reason (sometimes it's a dried up pond or lake, sometimes a rocky area), there aren't any trees but plenty of vegetation. They're nice, relaxing and inviting. Usually. But this time I got a feeling, a bad feeling. All of it was, with almost complete certainty, inside my head. Nevertheless, I stopped dead in my tracks. For reasons only my primal psyche knows, I wasn't about to walk into that clearing. I stood there, still, for about five minutes. I kept looking around, over my shoulder, behind me, but not moving forward. I had the feeling, crazy as it sounds, that something was waiting for me to move into that clearing, to get myself out in the open, and I wasn't about to oblige it.

I can guarantee you now what I could probably guarantee you then, that there was nothing there but the ancient synapses of my ancestors' primal fears firing into place, something instinctual about not letting yourself be exposed and vulnerable. Still, I felt it, and it was palpable. Eventually, after telling myself this was ridiculous for five minutes but not once convincing myself of said fact, I turned around and headed back, double time. To this day, it's the most unnerving hiking experience I've ever had. I've ventured back into the woods in South Carolina and Maryland and Vermont on numerous occasions without anything but glorious thoughts about nature's beauty and how wonderful it was and is to be alive. But on that day, I got spooked. And what I was spooked by was nothing. Nothing known, that is.

And that's the success of The Blair Witch Project, in the final estimate. It is not that "they don't show anything," as is often touted (although, admittedly, that's a big part of it as well). It's that they don't explain anything. We don't discover it was really just a bunch of backwoods rednecks, or pranksters or perhaps even a real witch. We don't find out anything. When the final words are spoken and the camera is blacked out, we have no answers to the question, "What happened?" All we know is there was something out there and our instincts told us to be afraid of it, and avoid it. The Blair Witch Project doesn't avoid it. Unfortunately, most of the horror genre does, which is a shame because the unknown, when done right, can trigger every primal fear we have. And that's a known quantity for the horror genre just waiting to be used.

16 comments:

Peter Nellhaus said...

A famed MGM screenwriter has a park named after her? Oh, wait . . . never mind.

bill r. said...

And that image -- very brief -- of Mike standing in the corner is a BRILLIANT horror moment, because we don't know why he's standing there. Yes, obviously we know the bit of backstory that moment is alluding to, but we don't know what or who put him in that corner at that moment. I get chills just thinking about it.

Great job, Greg. I got very, very tired of the backlash against this movie a long time ago, and got equally tired of defending it. Even John Carpenter came down on it, for the very reasons you outline. Jesus, haven't any of these people ever been scared before?

And while there are aspects of the characters' behavior that bug me, fleeing the tent isn't one of them. I mean, what, they should stay because those three, thin fabric walls with one exit will keep them safe? Even if someone could lay out why, theoretically, it would be better

Greg said...

Peter, I think of the forest every time I see her credit and think of her every time I see his name in South Carolina. I mean, it's only off by a letter.

Greg said...

So, John Carpenter comes down on it for the navigational gaffs? Oh well, it's one of those things where you can either let it ruin the movie for you or go with a feeling they're trying to produce instead. I go with the feeling, and even if one doesn't like 99 percent of the movie, the ending pretty much trumps everything else, doesn't it? I mean, like you said, those final glimpses are just outright creepy.

And, yes, I concede you're right about the tent. It's pretty flimsy so maybe fleeing is the best idea, although, for the purposes of the film, it didn't necessarily turn out to be.

Greg said...

Oh, and Peter, it's not a park, it's a forest. A bonafide forest too, not some nature trail and I was a few miles deep into it.

bill r. said...

No, not navigational reasons -- I should have been more specific, since you covered a lot of ground regarding the reasons people dislike the movie. Carpenter didn't like it because at the end you don't see anything. For a guy who's worked in horror as long as he has, you'd think he'd no better. Granted, he's not necessarily the biggest withholder (witholder?) of payoffs in film history, but PRINCE OF DARKNESS has a really nice inexplicability to its final moments, so he should have seen what they were going for with BLAIR WITCH.

bill r. said...

Hey, what happened to the rest of my first comment?

The rest should have said something like this:

Even if someone could lay out why, theoretically, it would be better for them to stay inside (which would be impossible, since we don't even know what the threat is), the impulse to flee isn't stupid; it's human.

Greg said...

Bill, I thought for sure you meant the stupid things the kids do because surely no one, certainly not a horror director, would dislike it because of the ending!!! That's fucking insane! I think showing anything at the end, other than the characters, would have been a mistake. I certainly think having, even for as a brief a time as a single frame because that can be paused and circulated, the camera twirl around and reveal a witch or disfigured face or whatever would've negated what the movie was trying to achieve.

People are dumb.

Arbogast said...

There were so many dumb arguments against The Blair Witch Project back in 1999 and I remember one of the most galling concluded with the remark "It's not a real movie." You know a movie has hit its mark when it brings out childish comments like that. It's the modern equivalent of a magic lantern show, a play of light and dark that gets you to do all the heavy lifting. And it's always more rewarding when you take an active part in scaring the shit out of yourself

Greg said...

The main beefs I have always gotten from people are the ones I mentioned, which I intended to deflate by mentioning them and then acknowleding their lack of importance, and the language. That is to say, the improv was not a lot more than, "What the fuck was that?" "Shut the fuck up!" "We're fucking lost!" "Fuck, fuck, fucker, fuckity, fuck fuck!"

So, okay, the characters lost in the woods were neither scouts nor linguistic scholars. What about the feel, you ask people. And then you get a response like the one you mention, that it's not a real movie, whatever in the hell that means.

I have the same problems with the movie and I also notice every time I watch Citizen Kane that no one is in the room with him when he says, "Rosebud." In neither case do those "problems" ruin the movie for me. In fact, I wrote a piece here about two years ago, including those examples, about how when a movie's good, all you have are nitpicky things because all the big stuff (mood, atmosphere, cinematography, acting, writing, directing, etc, etc, etc) has been taken care of.

In other words, if the best you can do to "take down" the movie is complaining about bad navigating and unimaginative use of adjectives, the movie must've done everything else right.

Christopher said...

I have a mystical thing about hill summits when I'm out hiking..quiet and otherworldly..but I like it..

Greg said...

Christopher, we love hiking the mountains of Vermont (I guess I could have said the green mountains of Vermont but the redundancy had to end somewhere). They're around 4000 ft elevation so it takes a couple of hours to get to the top but once there, it's glorious!

MovieMan0283 said...

I've been watching a lot of horror movies lately (been following a horror countdown in October) and I have to say your anecdote about the hiking trip spooked more than just about anything I saw on screen in that time. To the extent Blair Witch Project taps into that, it earned all its hype. It's that irrationality which fills you with dread in an all-too-silent moment, and somehow this terror's all the more terrifying in the sunshine, isn't it? (That part doesn't really tie in with Blair Witch, of course.) Wonderful anecdote there.

maren said...

Another story: Setting:night,somewhere in the wilderness,young couple in a tent. Something strange happened outside all around us.He:Talking of evil spirits I:Finding believable, rational and scientific explanations for everything just to get him outside the tent to have a look while i was still safe in the tent. Didnt leave the tent, never found out , perhaps he was right. So I defend Blair Witch and similiar movies and even idiot plots ,having good reasons for that.

Greg said...

Movieman and Maren, it really is true that the small things, and things unseen, are the most frightening. And when you're out in the wilderness, either in my situation or Maren's, things can happen that make you act irrationally.

maren said...

i just like to add that this is more a B-Movie Version than a real story but i guess that´s obvious...and this IS a filmblog. But the conclusion is still the same and i agree with yours.