
The story takes place in post-war Berlin as a group of United States Senators and Representatives visit the bombed out city to assess the morale of the occupation troops. One of those representatives is Phoebe Frost, played by Jean Arthur, a stalwart Republican from Iowa, clean, prudish and repressed. Obviously, just her read her name again. Upon arriving Frost meets Captain John Pringle, played by John Lund, and quickly makes him her liaison to the seamy side of Berlin so she can blow the roof off of the whole occupation, one she views as being knee deep in black markets and fraternization with ex-Nazi women. And, she's right. Problem is, Captain Pringle is the biggest black market wheeler and dealer out there and happens to be having an affair with a former Nazi seductress, Erika Von Schluetow, played by the magnificent Marlene Dietrich. Trying to keep his illegal activities a secret from Frost while keeping Von Schluetow out of the labor camps becomes the new 24 hour job of Pringle. It's a job made more complicated by his growing feelings for Frost, feelings easier to succumb to when further information is uncovered that Von Schluetow may have fraternized all the way up to Hitler.

Coming into theaters in 1948 this is delicate material to say the least and it's probably true that the only way one could have presented post-war Berlin (much of the movie was actually shot there) so soon after the war was in a romantic comedy so as not to recall too many painful memories for the audiences. It's a tightrope walk at which Wilder succeeds, lightening the mood just when talk of Nazis and Hitler and concentration camps is getting a little too heavy. And what must it have been like for Dietrich doing a scene with actors made up to look like Goebbels and Hitler? Whatever the feelings were during the production, the three leads produce excellent work throughout. Jean Arthur is probably the least of the three only because her character is giving to broader, much broader, strokes while the other two characters are far more grounded in reality. Still, she makes her character strong and sympathetic, not an easy job considering how close to caricature Wilder makes the character. Fortunately, Arthur has the talent to pull it off. Nevertheless, had Wilder made her a little less prudish, and a lot less easily bowled over by romance, both the character and the movie would have been much stronger.
John Lund on the other hand is perfectly cast. There was some discussion in the comments here as to whether his casting was a mistake or not and I have to say it was dead-on accurate. Captain John Pringle isn't Clark Gable, Captain John Pringle is an American soldier working the black market and bedding ex-Nazis who likes to think he's Clark Gable. His Gable moustache combined with his average-to-good looks work perfectly in a kind of "big fish in a small pond" way. As far as the bombed out refugees are concerned, especially ex-Nazis like Von Schluetow who needs someone she can use to keep her out of the labor camps, this guy is the best thing going. Back home he'd be just another poser, but here he's a hot property. A Bulova in a display full of Cartier's may not look too impressive but on the counter at the local convenience store next to a row of Timexes, it looks a lot better.

But no matter how good Arthur and Lund are it is Marlene that steals every scene, every frame, hell, the whole movie. Marlene Dietrich is a personal favorite and this movie does nothing to change that. There is an intelligence behind the way Dietrich speaks her lines that always makes me feel like she's the smartest person on the set, even when Orson Welles is hanging around. I'm not saying I think Lund and Arthur were unintelligent people, or anyone else Dietrich worked with, just that Dietrich had something, a knowingness that she couldn't hide. It's on display here in all it's glory and if Billy Wilder ever achieved a moment of perfection in casting, it's here. Von Schluetow needs a mixture of intellect and sexual energy to keep herself out of prison and Dietrich makes you believe that this ex-Nazi could successfully convince an officer in the United States Army to manipulate her files and cover up the truth.
A Foreign Affair is not a well known Billy Wilder, Charles Brackett collaboration and is not available on DVD but it should be better known than it is. It portrays a post-war occupation army in Berlin probably much closer to reality than any serious drama of the time would have done. Showing soldiers taking advantage of desperate locals on the black market, consorting with ex-Nazis and breaking curfew to engage in illicit activities around the clock would most likely have caused an outrage had it been presented in a dramatic, expose kind of a way. But as a comedy, it seems acceptable. And quite enjoyable.

11 comments:
I believe I've seen this film or part of it. I know what you mean about Dietrich. She was a committed Resistance fighter, and has the intelligence and courage that role demands. It comes through in everything she did. As for Jean Arthur, I love her, and assume that she came off as she did because she was the target chosen by Wilder to show his contempt for women, an ingredient never lacking in his films.
Dietrich is captivating to me. She seems so assured and smart and cosmopolitan, something not a lot of American actors have. That sounds really bad and I don't mean it quite that way, just that there's something wiser behind the eyes of the European actors of that era, like a Charles Boyer for instance, that wasn't there for the actors in the states.
I thought of actually going into the condescension Wilder shows for women in many of his films, something I notice more now thanks to you, but thought that might be going off track. Congresswoman Frost's name alone however is a stupid little joke that shows a little of what Wilder is all about: a women of seriousness and education serving in congress is simply a lost little girl who just needs to be fucked. When she finally is she can see how stupid all this career stuff was and just wants to marry our hero, Pringle. So yeah, there's that kind of hanging over the whole film.
The Arthur/Lund relationship in the picture is essentially a retread of the Garbo/Douglas relationship in Ninotchka: a "cold" woman enters into a new envrionment and is melted by romance and the attendant freedom to indulge in said romance. I think Wilder is juggling more balls in this one and didn't have the same sort of time to dedicate to Arthur's progression, which is why the whole thing comes off as it does.
Still, I liked the dynamic. I suppose I hold Wilder in higher regard than do either of you, and I'm probably more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for it, but I didn't see the relationship as indicative of Arthur's regression towards a simpler and (in Wilder's mind) more preferable brand of femininity; I saw instead a jaded, serious-minded woman entering into an environment of oppressive solemnity and discovering the value of moment-to-moment happiness and unfettered indulgence. I dunno, perhaps that's a little too postcard-y.
And for all that, I can't deny that Arthur's leg of the love triangle does come off as frothy counterpoint to the more complex and interesting relationship between Lund and Dietrich. I think I truly adore the movie, in any case.
I saw instead a jaded, serious-minded woman entering into an environment of oppressive solemnity and discovering the value of moment-to-moment happiness and unfettered indulgence. I dunno, perhaps that's a little too postcard-y.
No, that's a valid way to look at it. I'm not saying my viewing of it reveals anything more than what was common at the time, the cold woman falling for the romantic lover. That Wilder did condescend to women many times in his movies is true, I think, but here it is of the much milder forties variety which is why I don't put too fine a point on it in the review.
And I think the relationship between Arthur and Lund was very funny at times, especially in the file room and the line, "Don't tell me it's subversive to kiss a Republican." It's just that the Dietrich/Lund relationship was far more interesting to me.
I'm very glad I not only got to finally see it but see it on the big screen to boot. And those shots all over Berlin only a couple of years after the war are astonishing. You look at that footage and wonder how anyone survived.
Write about movies I've seen.
Sorry Bill, but I don't think the A.F.I. shows the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants movie.
I love this movie. There's an interesting story about Wilder making it. (To appreciate it, you have to know that his mother, whom he tried to persuade to leave Vienna but wouldn't do it, was deported to Krakow and probably died in Auschwitz.) They were editing that amazing aerial sequence over Berlin, the one that opens the movie. Someone remarked innocently that the destruction made him feel sorry for the Berliners. Wilder leaped up and yelled, "To hell with those bastards! they burned most of my family in their damned ovens! I hope they burn in hell!"
It always made me appreciate this movie's subtlety more; there's a great of deal of anger there, very artfully concealed.
Also totally loved the watch analogy. "Bulova in a case of Cartiers" is a phrase I may steal later, with careful attribution bien sur.
Siren, I've never heard that story but I like Wilder's response. Watching that aerial footage was very impactful for me. I'd seen photos and film before of the aftermath of WWII but this was the first time I'd seen it on a big screen and let me tell you, it was something to see.
Wilder really walked a fine line with the topic of this movie, even throwing in comic moments as Dietrich is being led away that she may use sex again to get her way. Considering his feelings I'd say he did an amazing job of concealing and restraining.
Next week we're going to take in Mon Oncle on the big screen. Thank heavens for the A.F.I.
Greg - Sorry, just gettng to this post very belatedly. You've really piqued my interest here. I've known of A FOREIGN AFFAIR, but have never seent it. I'd actually like to watch it with my Dad, who was stationed in Germany in 1947-48; it'd be extremely interesting to hear his perspective.
"A Foreign Affair" is a great movie thanks largely to Marlene Dietrich.
Dietrich was born in 1901, 46 when this movie was made, yet she possesses an onscreen allure and seductiveness that actresses decades younger than her will never possess.
She knows how to act, brilliantly. She knows how to pose for the camera, brilliantly. She's the perfect amalgamation of posture, talent and style.
One acting trick Dietrich shared:
When doing a love scene, look only into one of your partner's eyes.
She's doing precisely that in the love scene image above. She's looking directly into her partner's left eye, while completely ignoring his right. Yes it's artificial. Yes it's preposterous...
But when you look at that image, you realize it works, brilliantly.
Karl, I can't really disagree with anything you say because, frankly, I get a little weak in the knees when Marlene's on the screen, in any movie!
Post a Comment