
Dracula is horror. He's not the first horror figure by a long shot, that role belonging to some long-forgotten figure spoken of in the caves and drawn on the walls, probably some part mammoth, some part monster. And he's also not the oldest passed down in writing either, with such figures as the golem far surpassing his longevity. But Dracula is horror. He is monster, myth and menace, sexual menace, rolled into one.
Dracula is dread. He's the guy who comes into your home, into your bedroom, and takes care of your wife or fiance while you're away, or just in another room. When he leaves she has a disease, one that you can't cure unless you kill him before she dies and if she dies first there's nothing to do but drive a stake through her heart and cut off her head. But the part that really stings is... she can't wait for him to come back. And it's not like you can compete with him because you can't. See, it's not about looks because he doesn't have any. He's dirty, has a foul odor, sleeps in a coffin and has hairy palms... and she can't wait for him to come back. But it gets worse: He is most decidedly not a subject of the British Empire. Oh no, he's one of those swarthy types, an Eastern European lacking the refinement of a well-bred, well-educated Anglo-Saxon man. That's right, your girl has the hots for a foreigner. A foreigner who spreads disease and can disarm you physically in seconds, throwing you to the ground or out the window while your best girl pants in expectation and pulls back the sheets. You. Are. Impotent.
Dracula is the Victorian man's worst nightmare. And Dracula can be or mean almost anything. He can be the sexual predator, he can be the untrustworthy foreigner or he can simply be the monster hiding under the bed. The fact that Dracula can stand in for so many ills and dreads of our society as the perfect scapegoat is a testament to how well drawn he is in the epistolary novel written by Bram Stoker and first published in 1897. But I'm not here to talk about his multiple meanings or vampire symbology or why people are so afraid of the whole sense of "other." Rather I am here to state boldly and without reservation that the movie that best understands everything stated in the first two paragraphs is 1958's The Horror of Dracula (Dracula in Britain), directed by Terence Fisher and starring Christopher Lee as Count Dracula and Peter Cushing as Doctor Van Helsing.
The Horror of Dracula is a reboot, only they didn't call such things reboots in those days. It takes the basic, very basic, story of the novel and runs with it. The names are changed, the relationships are changed, the plot points are changed. But what they do is more extraordinary than providing a faithful adaptation (that was done by others later and didn't prove very interesting). What they do is cover the themes and ideas of Dracula and throw everything else away. Look not here for a deep reflection upon Van Helsing or Dracula or any of the characters. Look here for the bewitched damsel getting up to open those windows and unlock those doors because he's coming back tonight. Look here for a vampire woman attacking a good English man only to be thrown to the floor by Dracula and later to be staked, through the heart that is, by that very same good English man, already falling victim to the disease himself. Look for children led astray, burned impressions of crucifixes on foreheads, blood spurting death scenes and sunlight sending the unwanted one, that goddamn dark, stinky, swarthy son of a bitch, to his grave, as it were. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. The Horror of Dracula is about the idea of Dracula. It couldn't give less of a damn about the story of Dracula and that's why it's my favorite of the vampire genre. Because sometimes the best way to adapt a work of one medium to another is to interpret, not transcribe.
Dracula the vampire, and all of his ilk, will play strongly into the ideas and themes discussed this month here at Cinema Styles and so it seems fitting to introduce the month by introducing the Count but make no mistake: There will also be madmen and monsters, witches and ghosts, corpses and killers. It's October and we here at Cinema Styles welcome you and bid you good morning. Let the horror begin.

39 comments:
Most excellent post Gregula!!
You are right, Dracula is all of the above and I love October and all it holds in the way of horror.
Well done, Greg. This is probably my favorite Dracula movie, as well, and that ending is frickin' killer. Still, for my money, the best reboot Hammer was the work they did with the Frankenstein story. I actually still haven't seen them all, but at least two of them -- The Curse of Frankenstein and, especially, Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed are brilliant, exciting and wonderfully acted. God, Cushing was so great.
Rupert, thanks! I love the idea of the Count, the invader into our bedrooms and not schooled in our etiquettes to boot. It's a story that works on so many levels it's downright insane.
...and you've laid those ideas out so well and wittily in this post. Very impressive.
Bill - Shhhh! I'll be doing The Curse of Frankenstein later. More about it then.
I watched this again two weeks ago with my wife and youngest who was seeing it for the first time (she developed a love for horror movies early on thanks to me and my wife's affection for Universal, Hammer and Corman classics) and she loved it. She got scared at several parts and had to shield her eyes but she loves that kind of experience. Anyway, thing is, my wife remarked at how quickly it moves and how much vampire action there is and how you don't expect that as much back in the day. You know, you expect an opening setup and then nothing more until the climax but this movie really jumps in and keeps giving the viewer one great setup and payoff after another. Early Hammer horror movies were really great pieces of work.
Rupert, thanks again. There's so much more to talk about with Dracula and vampires on the whole but I didn't want to blow it all on the opening post. I'll definitely return to it throughout the month.
Muah ah hah hah hack gurgle cack, acchhh ...
Reverend, you okay? Would you like a glass of wine?
Count Gregula? What ever happened to Jonathan "Lapper" Harker?
By the way, if you need an incentive, there's a naked chick on my site.
That Jonathan has left the castle my friend. And don't be modest: Your latest review has bondage, torture and nudity!
Blood is for closers.
I take mine red.
Best banner ever?
13th comment!
While I prefer the BBC Count Dracula, I must say that the possibility of nonstop fang-on-neck action has me drooling. And it's making a mess.
Best banner ever?
What, that old thing? I found it lying in some earth in the cellar.
Marilyn, please, get a drool cup.
Oops, I mean, Countess.
Anyway, I'm off to the ghost office to mail some things in grave need of my attention. I hope they don't end up in the dead letter pile.
October puns. You can't beat 'em!
Good morning to you too Count Gregula! Now, may I embarrass myself and ask what that banner is from?
Also, "fang-on-neck" is hot, but I'm more of a fang-on-inner thigh guy.
Fox, that is from the very same Horror of Dracula described in the post, as in the top picture of this post and I have many more screengrabs from it I haven't used yet. The banner shows the ill-fated Lucy just as Van Helsing drives a stake through her heart.
I once had a long, drunken argument over the symbology of vampires so I heartily approve of this post.
Damn it! I missed all the puns!
Fangs for the memories, Gregula.
Krauthammer, your comment is quite biting.
Bill, you didn't miss them all. They're still one or two hanging around the... no... wait. They're gone.
Marilyn, you're hell-come.
I can always count on you, Gregula
I vant to stop reading y'alls bad puns.
I can't imagine Dracula movie is going to be that great. Yeah he is hungry with our blood!
you ever wonder who cooked those lavish meals for Harker at Dracula's place,since Drac was the only one at home with no servents?..He would a had to have slaved all day to prepare that Supper..Well he did have the wives.but I imagine they liked to sleep in all day too..
tdraicer here-not meaning to be anonymous, I just always have trouble with my google account.
I love Horror of Dracula for many reasons-not least the James Bernard score (especially its pounding chase music at the end) and also the BBC Dracula, but I believe the ultimate version of Stoker's novel is still to be made. ("Bram Stoker's Dracula" was anything but-whatever Dracula is, it isn't a love story.)
One of the better versions, btw, is the Orson Welles Mercury Theater radio adaptation. For example the sound of the snarling wolves when Harker tries to leave the castle. "Shut the door! Shut the door! Shut the door!" Dracula: "The door is shut Mr. Harker. I take it you will remain."
Christopher, I assume Drac has a scared villager come in and prepare the meals in exchange for... you know... protection. Drac's got a pretty good racket going.
tdraicer - I'd love to hear that Mercury Theatre Dracula. I'll find it online and listen.
I agree about Coppola's Dracula. There's too many visual tricks and gimmicks and cuts. One can't settle on the movie or it's story. And the haphazard way he introduces the epistolary nature of the novel only about three times. Someone's diary entry pops in for a brief moment then nothing for another 40 minutes. It's a mess, from start to finish.
Dracula is not a love story as so many people try to portray it.Its really kind of depressing in a way that Drac is more like some dread mass plague thats set upon England and theres the rush to find a cure..I re-read certain passages in the bookstore a month or so ago and found myself actualy getting chills as I read the passage about Lucy returning to her Crypt with the wimpering child..The way she is described,catching glimpses of her in the moonlight as the clouds pass over...(((shudder)))
I assume Drac has a scared villager
Scarred out of his wits, I'll wager!
the GALLOPING gourmet..
Great writing and great insight. I finally caught up with BLOOD OF DRACULA earlier this year and couldn't believe the animal-like qualities of Lee's character. You totally nailed the experience.
Thanks Doug! You're right, Lee plays it very beast-like, not suave and debonair like so many other Draculas.
I agree the definitive Dracula movie has not yet been made (BBC's Louis Jordan version comes close) but you could put together one super bad-ass Dracula movie by taking the best moments of all the Hammer Draculas: Say, the rifle-toting priest from 'Dracula, Prince of Darkness'; the moonlit roof-top chase scenes from 'Dracula Has Risen From the Grave'; the nubile young female vampires who kill their own fathers at Dracula's bidding in 'Taste the Blood of Dracula'; the likable young couple from 'Scars of Dracula' who fall under his sway; the fiery apocalyptic speech ("You play your wits against mine, me, who commanded an army hundreds of years before you were born?") that Lee makes at the end of 'Satanic Rites'; and last but not least, hot hot hot vampire babe Caroline Munro from 'Dracula A.D. 1972'. And of course to end it all, the fantastic fight scene between Cushing and Lee from 'Horror'!
Damn Will, I should make a montage out of that, it sounds great. I actually did have a montage I was working on last year that included the Cushing/Lee showdown in HORROR but I scrapped it having grown bored with making them by that point but maybe now I'll pick it back up again and finish the job.
Post a Comment