Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Middle Ground between Light and Shadow


As a part of October celebrations I watched Twilight Zone: The Movie, a film I'd not seen since its debut on cable way, waaaay back in the day. Watching it again with older, maybe wiser, eyes revealed a film so inconsistent as to make one wonder why they bothered releasing it. Add on to that the fact that three actors ( Vic Morrow, My-Ca Dinh Le and Renee Shin-Yi) were killed during filming due to questionable filming practices, ignored safety standards and violations of child labor laws and one really does get the feeling that out of respect alone they should have shelved it. But they didn't and I suppose Vic Morrow, the great character actor with such an extraordinary gift for playing the jerk, deserves recognition for his final performance, something too often overlooked in write-ups on the film.

Vic Morrow's performance comes in the first tale told (there are four in all, bookended by a mildly entertaining, and completely pointless, prologue and epilogue featuring Dan Aykroyd and Albert Brooks). The tale concerns a hateful bigot who, after spending his evening complaining about every non-white ethnic group under the sun controlling the world, walks out of a bar and into the Jewish ghetto in Nazi Germany. Get it? He's a Jew now, suffering divine retribution for his sins. Moments later he is a black man being held by the KKK (with a young John Larroquette as their leader) and then a Vietnamese man escaping American troops in Vietnam. This last sequence involved a scene where Morrow and two children (the actors named above) escape a helicopter attack which ended, in reality, horrifically as the helicopter lost control and descended upon and killed all three actors below. Whatever that scene entailed it was clearly vital to the sequence because without it the Vietnam sequence is so weak and meaningless that it honestly should have been left out. Editing out the helicopter scene, and the previous scene with the two children, but leaving in all that surrounded it seems both disrespectful and dishonest. Because the sequence is so weak and barely understandable (it's not even made clear that he is a Vietnamese man - that was made clear in the footage with the children apparently) it feels like it was left in just so they wouldn't lose any usable footage. If that is in fact the case then may I just offer up a huge "Fuck you" to John Landis and if it is not the case the "Fuck you" stands for filming at night with child actors illegally hired to avoid adherence to child labor laws, a fact that only Landis and first and second assistant directors Dan Allingham and Anderson House knew on the set. I won't go any further but if you would like to read more on this whole disgusting episode, go here. But back to Morrow. He is, as expected, excellent. Whether at the beginning of his career (Blackboard Jungle) or near the end (The Bad News Bears) Morrow could project hate and anger like few others. He is perfectly cast here and makes an otherwise unmemorable segment slightly better.

Then there's the second segment, directed by Steven Spielberg and without a doubt the weakest of all four segments. No, that's not right, it's much worse than weak. It's horrible, insufferable, unbearable. It is a ripe stinking piece of garbage. It's a story about a group of old timers who get the chance to be young again thanks to a magic man with a twinkle in his eye and... Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!! The music is goopy, the shots are sickly sweet, the child actors playing the old timers now young are AWFUL! Oh screw it, here just watch this Cinema Styles video review:



Moving on to the third segment things improve dramatically. The music still sucks for the most part (only because Jerry Goldsmith doing 'whimsical' is just about the worst thing the Earth has ever known) but the story and pacing are a hell of a lot better. Kathleen Quinlan stars as Helen, a woman taken to a strange house by a strange boy named Anthony who can make anything happen by wishing. He has, we find out, held four people captive that he reveals to outsiders as his family. A fifth hostage, and true relation - his sister, sits in the bedroom silently watching cartoons, her mouth long ago removed by the vindictive Anthony. The story races along at a clipped pace as we watch the immensely entertaining set of character actors, including Kevin McCarthy, wiggle and squirm through sycophantic tributes to Anthony. The biggest fault of this story is it pretends to have a nice ending with Anthony telling Quinlan he let everyone go as she smiles and says she wants to be his teacher. Thing is, it's alluded to by one of the characters early on that his parents met a horrible fate at his hands. No mention is made of this as we all hold hands and watch flowers grow alongside the road as the new teacher and homicidal student drive off into the sunset. Ugh. I guess when Steven Spielberg is your producer these kinds of endings are unavoidable (at least, I should qualify, the Spielberg of 1983).

That takes us to the fourth and final segment, a reworking of the original series classic Nightmare at 20,000 Feet. John Lithgow takes over the role William Shatner made famous as an airline passenger terrified of flying who sees a gremlin on the wing of the plane destroying the engine. No one else sees it of course and Lithgow does a tremendous job of playing full-bore hysterical throughout most of the segment. It's not any better or worse than the original (maybe slightly worse - it plays the hysterical angle a bit too long) but it's not a bad capper to an otherwise undistinguished affair.

In the end, the first two segments (the first for its banality, the second for its no-holds-barred awfulness) weigh too heavily on this enterprise for the movie to succeed. By the time we get to the good stuff we've already entered an advanced state of indifference to the whole damn thing and even Joe Dante's and George Miller's very good third and fourth segments can't resuscitate this comatose patient. When the credits roll we feel a mixture of depressed detachment and relief. The movie didn't really affect us one way or the other and yet we're glad it's over. Like Rod Serling's famous narration, it occupies the middle ground between light and shadow, never really venturing fully into either, staying the middle course, playing it safe and finally, and ultimately, failing as both.

35 comments:

Rick Olson said...

I think that review of the Steven Spielberg segment may be the finest review you've ever done. It captures the angst, the anger, and -- dare I say it? -- the delicate eroticism inherent in reviewing a film.

Also, it was hilarious.

Greg said...

Thanks Rick! It certainly was easier than writing everything out. I think using clips from various movies to express my feelings on any given film may be the wave of the future around here.

Rick Olson said...

Yeah, writing's a bitch, ain't it?

Greg said...

Yup.

Flickhead said...

They used Vic Morrow's death to promote this terrible movie; when it came out, all you heard or read about was his accident. Few bothered reporting on My-Ca Dinh Le or Renee Shin-Yi; in fact, I never knew their names until reading your post.

(The Joe Dante segment is a lot of fun.)

This led to Spielberg's Amazing Stories TV show, which wasn't much of an improvment. However, it was better than the Young Sherlock Holmes TV show.

Greg said...

Yeah, you know the studio was publically shunning the publicity but privately they were eating it up no doubt realizing without it this turkey would have bombed badly.

That Spielberg segment actually made me livid. I was noticeably pissed off when it ended. God I hated it! It is exactly that kind of syrupy drivel that gave Spielberg a bad name and he's never broken completely free from it. That it inspired a television series instead of inspiring a back to the drawing boards re-evaluation of what types of films he should direct (hint: action) is depressing.

Marilyn said...

Ducking my head in to say "hi" and that I'm reading as much as I can. Can't comment on this because I don't think I ever saw it, but I kind of found the premise pointless. The deaths, of course, are more famous than the product.

Back to the writing pit...

Greg said...

Can't comment on this because I don't think I ever saw it, but I kind of found the premise pointless.

One, you don't have to have seen it because you can trust my review: it's not worth seeing.

Two, the video review. The video review! It makes a commanding statement.

Greg said...

plus the written review is entertaining enough, right? I mean, I give a "fuck you" to John Landis twice. Twice!

Peter Nellhaus said...

At least Into the Night had Michelle Pfeiffer.

Greg said...

And he didn't kill her or Jeff Goldblum. Anyway, I like Into the Night for the most part although I think it's a little overrated by the current blogging community.

Fox said...

Greg-

I agree with you about the feeling of "indifference" towards this movie, but the Dante section is so insane (in a good way) that I can't help but not flick the entire film off my shoulder completely.

Also, thanks for bringing up the Landis helicopter story. Though the info is out there, I feel it's been buried as well as it can be, and that Landis has been protected more than he should be. If it's true that he was strongly advised (as I have heard) that the helicopter was flying too low and it was too dangerous and he STILL went through with the shot, then Landis needs to take responsibility. But, then, to blacklist the people that DID speak up about it, well, I think we can all agree about the scumminess involved with that. I have a hard time watching John Landis movies anymore.

Arbogast said...

I've always wondered if Aykroyd and Brooks could have carried a horror movie on their own. I wouldn't want to see them do it now but it could have been pretty rad back in he day.

bill r. said...

I thought Brooks was really funny in the prologue.

I heard that Landis gave a eulogy at Morrow's funeral, saying, in effect (and in part) that at least they had Twilight Zone: The Movie as his final work. Sterling Silliphant, one of Morrow's friends, was obviously appalled at Landis using the funeral as a commercial.

Greg said...

Fox, the Dante segment is the best of the four. The Lithgow airplane segment is good but too bent on playing the hysterical and immediate shock instead of building up the sense of dread the original episode had. The Dante segment does build and when it does go full tilt it's the perfect climax.

Why didn't Kathleen Quinlan ever become a bigger presence in movies?

Greg said...

I've always wondered if Aykroyd and Brooks could have carried a horror movie on their own.

They could've I think. One thing that always drags American Werewolf in London down for me is the utter blandness of David Naughton but put Albert Brooks in that role and watch him freak out over everything that's happening and have Dan Aykroyd visit him from beyond the grave and I'm on board.

Greg said...

Bill - click on the link I provide in the review. It's ten full pages giving every piece of info you need on the whole sordid affair.

Here is the relevant section on the funeral of Vic Morrow:

George Folsey Jr. and John Landis wanted to deliver eulogies at Vic Morrow's funeral. A close friend of the actor, Steve Shagan, reacted skeptically when the two said they wanted to speak about Morrow.

Folsey privately read his intended remarks to Shagan who exploded in outrage, "Why don't you just run the trailer?" he asked sarcastically. "Let's set up a screen right here. We can even sell tickets. . . . You're not going to read that thing. . . . there has to be a time and place where somebody isn't selling tickets!"

Both Folsey and Landis did read remarks at Morrow's funeral. "If there is any consolation in this," Folsey told the assembled mourners, "it is that the film was finished. Thank God. This performance must not be lost. It was Vic's last gift to us."

Landis' eulogy sounded equally self-serving and clumsily ironic. "Tragedy can strike in an instant," an obviously distraught Landis said, "but film is immortal. Vic lives forever. Just before the last take, Vic took me aside to thank me for the opportunity to play this role."

bill r. said...

Steve Shagan...that's right. I knew it was a writer whose first and last name began with "S".

Just before the last take, Vic took me aside to thank me for the opportunity to play this role...

Jesus Christ. The last take!? Goddamn you, John Landis. Seriously.

Greg said...

It's fucking grotesque! First of all, if you read the chain of events it's clearly a lie. You got Morrow and the kids in the water with a huge pyrotechnics display being set up and the helicopter standing by and at no point is there any time for Morrow to wade out of the water between takes and grab John to thank him. And everyone probably knew it was a lie which made it worse. Seriously, Landis comes off as a total fuckhole. The terms of the civil suit against him by the families was never disclosed and comes with the requisite gag order but goddamn I'd love to hear Jennifer Jason Leigh tear him a new one. She's got that scariness that dad had.

bill r. said...

I just bought An American Werewolf in London, a movie I genuinely like, but now I feel bad about putting money in his pocket.

There have been at least two books written on the subject of Landis and the Twilight Zone tragedy. One of them, called Outrageous Conduct (I think that's it) is supposed to be very good. I should get it.

Greg said...

I just bought An American Werewolf in London, a movie I genuinely like...

I own it too and like it but I've never loved it and feel given its premise I should. Problem is always Naughton. He's just sooooo dull.

As for Landis, well, at least this was made before Twilight Zone which is something I guess.

I'd like to read that book too and it's non-fiction which is pretty much all I read.

bill r. said...

Naughton's maybe not the best choice in the world, but I never thought he was that bad. And your earlier idea, of replacing Dunne with Ackroyd is, I must say, not the best one you've ever had. Which I say because I really like Dunne, and hate Ackroyd.

Arbogast said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Arbogast said...

I have no problem with Naughton and even think he brings value to the role. He's bland but likable, his wit works for him (unlike the tart rejoinders that pop out of the veneered mouths of most horror protags these days) and because he seems so unlikely to become a werewolf (unlike Oliver Reed or Jack Nicholson, who both seem lupine to begin with) his transformation and final fate are all the more horrific.

Greg said...

I went with Aykroyd merely to complete the duo since Arbo had wondered aloud about the pair doing a horror film. I too love Dunne in the role but despite what both of you have to say I stand by my opinion that Naughton helps sink the ship. I'm not looking for snappy rejoinders but for a character I can believe in and Naughton as an actor doesn't even have enough gravity to make me believe he's freaking out because his line readings are so weak.

Still, on the whole, I like the movie although when I saw it again last year for the first time since the eighties it didn't hold up for me as well as I thought it would.

bill r. said...

I'm not looking for snappy rejoinders but for a character I can believe in and Naughton as an actor doesn't even have enough gravity to make me believe he's freaking out because his line readings are so weak...

I don't know...I think he's delivery of "Holy shit" after the double nightmare is pretty good.

Brian Doan said...

Great post, Greg-- that video review is brilliant!

Man, what a steaming dunghole this movie is. The Spielberg segment is the worst thing he's ever done; the Dante is, for me, self-indulgent and too over-the-top (although I appreciate the strong case you made for it), and too reminiscent of the last 1/4 of EXPLORERS (a film I otherwise like); and while I like the Miller/Lithgow segment a lot, I can't disagree with your contention that it comes too late in the film.

Honestly, the most enjoyable part of this sack of cow poo for me is the Ackroyd-Brooks stuff-- I can't disagree it feels a little extraneous, but I appreciate the genuine joy and chemistry the actors have together, and that "remember the show?" bit seems like the most honest part of the film for me, since it's basically what the movie is-- boomers indulging their nostalgia. It might have been cool to extend their characters into other parts of the film (since it's about TV, I could see them slipping easily into the Dante segment, and maybe giving it more coherence).

As for Landis' bit-- it's the worst segment for me, both because of the real-life tragedy, and because the thing is so obvious and didactic and sophomoric; why not just put up a ten-minute title card that reads, "IRONY!"? There was an episode of NIGHT GALLERY that did the "Nazi war criminal pays for his sins" plot far more effectively (can't remember the episode title now), too.

And Landis really is a shit, too, isn't he? I didn't know Jennifer Jason Leigh was related to Vic Morrow.

Greg said...

and that "remember the show?" bit seems like the most honest part of the film for me, since it's basically what the movie is-- boomers indulging their nostalgia.

You're right, that's all this is anyway. Each generation indulges their nostalgia by turning their television shows into movies. I'm not sure that trend will continue though. I think a big part of it was bringing it back and with the availability of everything now online one can indulge nostalgia at will!

But the greatest point you make is about Aykroyd and Brooks slipping into the movie. Why didn't they do that? That would've been much better. Instead of having Aykroyd turn into a ghoul/goblin/vampire thingy at the end of the prologue just have them be two normal guys. As the prologue ends they pull into a bar for a drink... and that's where Morrow shows up. Then they're attendants at the old folks home, customers in the diner Kathleen Quinlan first goes to, passengers on the plane. Sounds like a missed opportunity to make this film at least a little tighter.

And yes, Jennifer Jason Leigh is Morrow's daughter.

Oh, and thanks for the praise on the video review. It's encouraging to hear (from you and Rick). Appreciate it.

bill r. said...

Sorry I haven't said anything about the video, Greg, but I haven't had a chance to watch it yet...

Greg said...

It's okay...

Jerk.

Adam Zanzie said...

Every review I've read of Twilight Zone: The Movie inevitably says the same thing: the relatively unknown Dante and Miller completed segments which are in turn far richer than their two famous counterparts. I'm in agreement- but one thing, Greg, that I'm happy you pointed out about the Landis segment was that Morrow gave a tremendous final performance. All the same, ending the segment with him being shipped off to Auschwitz is, admittedly, too unhappy of a Twilight Zone ending for me. I would have been more admirable of the segment if it had ended as originally planned: with Morrow saving the kids from the village and becoming a changed man in the process, free of his stinging prejudice. It would have been a sentimental ending, to be sure, but also more satisfying.

I'm disappointed that you neglected to give equal praise to Scatman Crothers' performance in the "Kick the Can" segment. It's the one lasting virture which at least makes that part of the film watchable; Crothers has a twinkle in his eye that cannot be ignored. Spielberg, however, was evidently not keen on putting his heart into the segment; after Landis went on trial for involuntary manslaughter, Spielberg lobbied hard to drop out of the project altogether, but then Warner Bros indicated that if he did so, the public would probably suspect him of having something to do with the accident. Of course, the rumors have been dispelled and Spielberg was not on the set that night, but he did make every attempt to distance himself from the whole affair.

His friendship with Landis ended immediately afterward. The biographer Joseph McBride reportedly confronted Landis at a 1995 book signing and was informed, "Steven and I haven't spoken for years".

bill r. said...

I watched your video, Greg. I think you hit the nail on the head. Although, you know, the kids are bathed in a golden light. So, I mean. Come on.

A guy came into my office once and said he was the Lord, Martin Luther King, and Scatman Crothers. He was mistaken on all counts.

Greg said...

Adam, I've personally never seen Vic Morrow give a bad performance and there is no doubt in your mind watching that segment that he is a hateful jerk. It is a terrific performance in an otherwise lackluster segment.

As for Scatman he too was a great character actor but I feel he wasn't asked to do much here. Basically smile and look magical whereas in something like The Shining he is projecting assurance to Danny, fear, apprehension, wisdom and so on. It's a much more demanding role worthy of his talents. I just didn't feel the Spielberg segment offered him much as an actor.

And I can believe Spielberg ending his friendship with Landis after this after reading up on the unacceptable carelessness of Landis during the whole affair. I would too.

Greg said...

Bill, thanks! Did the guy coming into your office make you young again? Are you ten right now running and jumping around the park saying things like "Tally ho!"? If not you should be.

Brian Doan said...

I find it very hard to believe the star of this would not make an excellent horror star.