"... when I see a fact plainly I feel lightened, set free from the more or less conscious effort to maintain a delusion." - Anne Truitt, Daybook: The Journal of an Artist.
Lately, I've become a bit obsessed with scouring online historical archives of letters, manuscripts and photos that I have access to at work. Many are even open without a subscription and many are available in such public arenas for anyone to search on such as the Library of Congress archives where Wikimedia Commons and Shorpy get most of their photos. Since they're open for anyone to search I've taken to scouring the lot at home too. I've always had a fascination with the past and my love of old movies is a part of that. I not only love the art form itself, but I love the idea of old movies acting as a sort of time capsule. Ever since I watched Dancing Lady and put up the video of the chorus girls singing The Gang's All Here (second clip at the bottom of the post) I've wondered what happened to them? What direction did their lives take? I wondered the same after posting about Debra Paget and Gloria Krieger in which I detailed the arcs of their respective careers. But it's more than just movie chorus girls and bygone studio hopefuls. It's also all the people that never had anything to do with show business.
Scouring the archival news photos produces an uneasiness at times and a sadness as well. There are crime photos of policemen at the scene of a brutal beating or murder. There are photos of people living on the edge of society, making do, scraping by. Photos of poor children from the Depression clinging to their mothers. And most photos come with names included, as well as addresses and dates. And yet searches online come up blank in an effort to find out more about them. Alas, events as bad occur so often and situations as dire exist worldwide with such permanence and repeat with such consistency that most records are limited to a caption on a news photo. There simply isn't any other information on these people available and soon enough, they are all forgotten.
Then there are the time capsule photos, personal portraits from another time and place. There's a Navajo child with a blanket around his head in 1905. He looks to be about five years old. It's a stretch to think he's still alive, but having a 109 year old person today isn't nearly as rare or extraordinary as it used to be. Whether alive or dead, I wonder what his life was like. Of course, I'll never know.
And this fascination of mine goes back well before the internet came along. In my early teens I used to go to the local college's library and spend hours going through microfilm from the early twentieth century. I read about the Titanic, the Stock Market crash of 1929, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the 1964 Anchorage earthquake and so on, all from the perspective of what was written in that moment, before it became rigid history.
And when I had my driver's license I drove deep into the rural areas of my birth state, South Carolina. I'd get in the car and drive for an hour or two until I was as far away from civilization
as I could get, until I was surrounded by tens of thousands of acres of marsh and communities without electricity, where they farm what they eat and bury their dead in makeshift cemeteries near their homes. I stopped at a couple of these cemeteries, a few miles into the woods off of Highway 41. The names of men and woman who had lived for only a few years or for ninety were burned into thick pieces of wood acting as tombstones. What had their lives been like? Were they aware of many of the historic events of their day or did they live sheltered in their own community unaware of most of the goings on of the outside world? Had they ever watched a television? Been to a movie? Listened to a radio? Talked on a phone?
When I left South Carolina all those years ago I knew I would be leaving those explorations behind but I wasn't sure how much longer those areas would survive anyway. On visits back home in the nineties I found new mini-mansions going up just a mile or two from the rural areas I once frequented. The roads leading up to them, once dirt for miles, were now paved up to the new homes. And power lines were now evident where before there were none. Are those communities and cemeteries I drove to many years ago still there or have the remaining families been bought out and relocated? I assume the latter only because new technology like Google maps has allowed me to search the areas I once visited without physically returning to them. From overhead anyway, they look pretty full now. And so one more remnant of the past is lost forever. Had I taken pictures back then there might be that to show for it but like those news photos it still wouldn't tell much of a story. Most of it will always reside only within the memory.
But memories don't even last very long, including memories within familial generations. Grandparents are often remembered firsthand but great-grandparents are only names from stories related by older relatives. Great-great-grandparents are usually unknown to most family members even by way of story. Beyond that, going back five or so generations most of us have no clue as to who was in our family at that time or what their names were. And even if we do because we researched our genealogy it's still not the same as having an actual memory of them.
Eventually, everyone reading this post will be forgotten. Not a one of us will be remembered beyond a certain point in time. Even those figures in history who changed the landscapes of their times are eventually just a name that very few people know. Figures from a few hundred years in the past are still known well enough today but go back three thousand years and the number of people who know the rulers of Egypt or Greece or China will drop by factors of ten. In ten thousand years the 20th Century figures so prominent in our historical studies today will be completely and totally forgotten to all but a few of the most ardent history enthusiasts. That's because so much will happen in the next ten thousand years that will gradually overtake all that came before.
Of course, in the end, the universe will run its course regardless of what any of us do. No matter how important we may think we are, the fact is that a stray dog or an oak tree or a pebble on the side of the road will have as much impact on the outcome of the universe as you, and they're not even trying. All we can hope for is to make our time here worthwhile, for both ourselves and those important to us.
My wife makes life worthwhile for me as do my adopted children, my cat, my friends and family and my online friends and fellow bloggers. Sometimes I feel like abandoning them all in a fit of insecure temperament. A feeling of not being impactful enough on the things around me, impactful in a positive way. But of course I don't. There's too much still to be experienced and for most of it, I'm the only record it's ever going to have. Once I'm gone most of those records will go with me.
And that includes movies. Even though thousands of movies from the thirties and before exist in digital form most are not viewed in anything approaching the numbers of even the most moderately successful January filler movie put out by Studio A. I don't express it enough in
comments on other blogs (something I've become very remiss in doing lately outside of my core group of blogs, and you know who you are because of my comments there) but I have a level of appreciation that goes far beyond what a "thanks" or "great post" could ever adequately express. When I see one of my online friends review a little known film from the thirties or forties or any decade really, I feel a pleasure and a pride at being a part of that community. I may not comment as often as I should on the classic film blogs that fill my blogroll, or the other blogs that deal with a specific niche or genre, but I am grateful for what they do. And when a blogger writes up a film that few people have bothered to see they are recording it for history. It's true. You see, outside of the big classics or the current blockbusters there isn't a huge online digital archive of reviews for thousands and thousands of little known or underseen movies. For better or worse, the blogs and the websites are historical archives that keep the memory alive for everything from The Third Secret, Witchcraft, and Gabriel Over the White House to Beyond the Rocks, Edvard Munch, or La BĂȘte Humaine. I'd like to keep contributing to that community myself and continue to be one of its record keepers.
But I grow weary. Weary of the structure, weary of restricting or limiting myself based on what type of blog I'm supposed to be running. A weariness that soon turns to hopelessness. I cannot start another blog. I simply cannot do it. I have three running right now and a fourth would drive me over the edge. I'd rather just throw everything in here, stir it up and see what happens. The name of the blog is Cinema Styles and I'd like to explore the cinema more deeply. But I'd like to explore that which is spoken to me by photography as well, even if said photograph has nothing to do with the movies. Tom Sutpen's blog If Charlie Parker Was a Gunslinger, There'd Be a Whole Lot of Dead Copycats has always been an inspiration to me, so in love with the photographic record of the past as I am. I'd like to take that inspiration and make something of it right here on Cinema Styles. So expect to start seeing photos from history outside of the movies as well. Maybe even my own photos will post from time to time, maybe my own movies, and not just the montages but original productions. I don't know what I want to do exactly and I probably never will. But I do know this: I don't want to be weighed down by delusions anymore. I've got a humdrum job and my wife and I struggle to make ends meet. That's a fact. We find solace in each other and our art. And I find solace in memory, the collective memory of the world around me and I want to keep that memory alive for as long as I can and in any way that I can. It's a journey I want to take and if you want to go along with me I welcome you. If not, I understand and no offence taken but don't act surprised when decidedly non-movie posts begin to appear with more frequency. The focus here will always be the movies, fear not, but a little branching out is good for the soul.
A love of history is as big a part of me as a love of film and for me, they go hand in hand. I see movies when I read about history which is to say I see stories being told. And when I see a movie I see moments preserved in time. A movie like It Happened One Night, this past weekend's Friday Night Movie for me, my wife and our youngest who made the selection, isn't just a great road comedy but a visual record of how things looked in 1934. Even if how they looked is only how things looked for movies at that time, or how people spoke, it's still a record of that. And the past recorded by photograph or film is something I'd like to explore more deeply. And so I shall. Like I said before, join me if you will, the choice is yours. I'll make the journey regardless but I'd love to have some company. And let's lay that name illusion to rest for good. I've had all I can take of the moniker "Jonathan Lapper." After almost two years I know it's quite an adjustment to throw on people and I apologize but I don't want any curtains obscuring anything here, anymore. A couple of you already know this but for the rest of you my first name is Greg and my last name is the same as the director of Bad Lieutenant who has the first name Abel. To keep it relatively Google search safe from work (notice I didn't actually spell out the last name but feel free to use it just as you would use Lapper) I'll go by Greg F., taking my inspiration from my friend Bill R. And since so many I've met here ARE my friends, I feel they should call me by my name. My real name.
And that's it for now. I look forward to sharing and recording images and thoughts on movies and history and blurring the line between both. And sharing photographs and movies of my own creation. And I'll enjoy doing it as myself. Finally.

115 comments:
I'm going to strangely miss the Lapper name. But it's nice to "meet" the real you, now.
To paraphrase a certain Ms. Gore, it's your blog and you can do what you want to. Don't feel like you're wedded to a certain format or subject matter. Most of us go through some kind of changes, some more obvious than others. From my point of view, no explanations or apologies are needed.
Speaking of films from the Thirties, Warner Brothers has more films from the vault on DVD next week. Included is Wild Boys of the Road.
Ed, you'll be my first response as Greg instead of Jonathan. Ferrara, instead of Lapper.
I'm sure I'll miss Lapper too for a while but I really want to expand what I'm doing here and eventually put up original works outside of montages and I want everyone to know my name if that's what I'm doing.
Peter,
I agree, most of us go through changes on the blogs here and there but I just wanted to let folks know this is going to become much more inclusive of photography and short film than before and that photography will deal as much with history as cinema.
In the last several months my wife and I have acquired probably around twenty new DVDs from the thirties. More becoming available is nothing but great news.
Well. Hello, Greg F. Nice to meet you. This is going to take some getting used to, obviously, but I'm on board for this new direction you're taking with your blog, which you've been threatening...er, promising, for a while now. I'm looking forward to it, and I hope you and I don't start fighting or anything. Jonathan Lapper was okay, but this Greg F. guy is probably kind of a jerk.
And hey, I made a "man behind the curtain" reference today, too! That is nuts!!
Bill - Yeah, I feel kind of bad about it. Here's the thing, when I first started I wanted a pseudonym that was a proper name for purposes of making it more personal and I was paranoid about my real name being discovered. But then after a while I got close to you guys which I'm not sure I ever expected to happen. Anyway, I started to think of all of you as my friends and well, it just seemed odd to have friends calling me something other than "Greg."
So I'm sorry everyone for my screwy, original pseudonym idea and I hope it doesn't drive everyone nuts having to use a new name now. But please everyone do because I want the pseudonym to DIE, DIE, DIE!
You don't need to feel bad about it. If I were in your shoes, I'd most likely want to make the same move. Anyway, it's not like we all hang out in person all the time, and one day you said, "By the way, guys, my real name is Greg". If that were the case, we'd all be accidentally calling you "Jonathan" for weeks afterwards, but since as it stands now we're all typing your name, I doubt you'll get many comments that begin, "So, Jonath -- I mean, Greg..."
Interesting, weighty post.
First, thanks to Peter for mentioning Wild Boys of the Road, a depression-era classic that's not to be missed.
I can relate to the attraction of the nom de plume, though in my case things ran differently. I tested a pseudonym out on a couple of my (very cynical) friends who quipped, "Who are you trying to kid?" Then I went through a phase of spelling out my entire name, first, middle and last. Someone said, "But I call you Ray. Why not just stick with that? Raymond Francis Young sounds like a lawyer I wouldn't hire." So I just pared it down to reality.
"But I grow weary. Weary of the structure, weary of restricting or limiting myself based on what type of blog I'm supposed to be running. A weariness that soon turns to hopelessness. I cannot start another blog. I simply cannot do it. I have three running right now and a fourth would drive me over the edge."
My politics occasionally run to the left of Lenin, but, dude, seriously, unless you're earning some scratch, there's positively no need to get this distressed over a blog. Imagine humanity existing for thousands of years without them; a pox on Blogger for making them so readily available a few short years ago. Websites were adequate; blogs just make us spend too much more time away from reality.
Almost a year ago, I "retired" my blog out of disgust. I found that if I regarded it as a toy and didn't take the thing seriously, I'd be better off.
My website went up in 1997. After years of not getting my work published, I figured a website would serve as a portfolio to offer to potential editors and publishers. Just as things were inching in my direction, Blogger kicked in.
Within no time, hundreds of good writers surfaced -- showing their wares for free. My portfolio seemed obsolete. I started a blog to keep up. At first it seemed possible, but then film blogging spread like the plague. The print publications I'd been trying to get published in were scaling back or closing shop.
Frustration set in. Moreso when the Cinemarati was beginning to form. I emailed, offering my services. No one replied. Cinemarati started, no invitations for Flickhead. Blogger started. Bloggers like Andrew Grant and Siren were invited to Cinemarati, for having blogs that were up for a year or so. I'd been online for about ten years. Teeth grit. Me: pissed off.
Cinemarati disbands. New film groups start, Flickhead ignored. Blogs with links to virtually every film blog ignore Flickhead. Teeth grit harder. Films in Focus interviews bloggers, no calls made to Flickhead.
After a while, the message is clear: I'm still the fat kid called on last in gym class. As Emily Blunt says in The Jane Austen Book Club, "High school never ends."
I could go on, aimlessly, endlessly -- but chances are I'd delete this before positing it. Suffice it to say, I stomp sour grapes and produce something not unlike MD 20-20.
I doubt you'll get many comments that begin, "So, Jonath -- I mean, Greg..."
You're probably right Stev... I mean, Bill.
But we could hang out all the time in person if we wanted to. Think how awesome it would be to hang out with Marilyn or Arbo or Kimberly in front of the 7-11 for, like, hours and hours, drinking slurpies and talking trash. And then we could look at our cars and compare engines or something until the cops came and told us to leave.
March 18, 2009 10:54 AM
I started a blog to keep up. At first it seemed possible, but then film blogging spread like the plague.
Yeah, it's confusing to me at times. I feel like Robin Williams in the grocery store in Moscow on the Hudson, so overwhelmed by my choices that I want a Police state to just provide me with 10 blogs to read and no more.
And - AND - with each new blog it seems the current "what's out right now" is what gets the readership not focusing on classics. I mean, everyone reviews them occasionally but for the most part it's what's in theatres now that gets the readership.
And that's why I said, "Fuck it, I'm going to start putting up my history stuff too because I'm never going to be a top blogger with my content anyway."
Blogs with links to virtually every film blog ignore Flickhead.
How many have the balls to even admit that bothers us? That's why you're a favorite of mine Ray and always will be. I go to a blog that has seemingly every goddamn movie blog in existence on its blogroll and no Cinema Styles and I think, "What the hell did I do wrong? Why does this guy (or group) hate me?"
But like you said, in the end you can't get stressed about it. My friends have me blogrolled and that's what's important to me. And I'm pretty easygoing with mine. If I discover some new blogger has added me to his or hers I add them to mine. It's only courteous. It's a blogroll not a goddamn sacred parchment.
Thanks for a great comment Ray.
And for films from the Thirties, Eclipse has the new set of films by Hiroshi Shimizu. I will be seeing all four from Netflix this week. I saw the first one, Japanese Girls at the Harbor, last night.
"And - AND - with each new blog it seems the current "what's out right now" is what gets the readership not focusing on classics. I mean, everyone reviews them occasionally but for the most part it's what's in theatres now that gets the readership."
They've also developed a new definition of what constitutes a "hit movie." There was a time when a movie played, and played, and played. I remember there were lines in front of single-screen theaters showing The Graduate or The Exorcist when those films were in their secord or third months of release.
Two weeks ago Watchmen opens to great business. By the second week, its box office drops a whopping seventy percent, yet it's termed a hit. Word of mouth pulverized it. Word of mouth used to make movies hits, not effective ad campaigns that got the lemmings in on opening weekend.
Japanese Girls at the Harbor
I've seen that. Or, well, no, but something with a similar title. Different genre though, probably.
Peter, you're a wealth of useful information as always. I haven't seen Japanese Girls at the Harbor but I'll queue it up. Too many foreign films from the thirties I haven't seen.
Flickhead, long gone are the days of a movie being held over. Boy, I used to love that. "Held over for three weeks!" the ads would trumpet. Or seven or ten or twenty! That's when you knew it was a true blockbuster. Now it's all opening weekend and DVD sales. Not nearly as exciting.
I still remember the first three screen cinema to come to my hometown sometime in the mid seventies. And I still remember my mom asking, "What are they going to show on three screens?! Are there even enough movies out at any given time to do that?"
I can even remember what one of the movies playing on it was - Burnt Offerings. I saw it with my brother.
Bill, I too have seen movies with similar titles. Movies with "at" or "the" in the title. The amazing coincidences here never end do they?
Well, hello, Gregory. OK, I'll drop the formality I had with "Jonathan" and just call you Greg.
I'm not even a little disturbed by your change in direction. As you know, I have a strong format on Ferdy, but if I couldn't write about the things that mattered to me in "Our Backstreets," I would be bored and frustrated. I love history and photography, too, so I'm looking forward to what you come up with.
If you want to know what to do with "Jonathan Lapper," I'll tell you what a friend of mine did. He's a writer who used to review theatre under the pseudonym "Bury St. Edmunds." When he quite his job and moved to LA, he bought a lobster, named it "Bury St. Edmunds," cooked it, and ate it.
And, Ray, I understand your story all too well. I've been insulted at times by the lack of regard my "peers" have shown me. Working long and hard at a consistent level of quality should be rewarded, but Flickhead was always a site that I heard nothing but respect for. As a newer film blogger, I have to admit that I didn't understand your site architecture - I thought you were just the blog. After I found the review sections, I read them. But by then, it was near the end for you.
As for being invited to the party, it's still a matter of personality and location. We have to remember that people like the Siren have relationships outside of the blog with industry people. I totally and completely love the Siren and her writing, and I've been blessed to have her hold me in high regard. But she's a different kind of writer, a different kind of woman than I am. As a female film blogger, I know that most collectives only have room for one "Shirley MacLaine," and frankly, I'd pick the Siren over me most days of the week. Being an out and proud feminist means I'll be in the second or third tier (or lower) of any larger grouping I choose to attach myself to (except maybe feminists). That's ok with me. I know who I am and feel my worth. I hope you do, too.
I like having our little band of bloggers. We found each other and stuck together because we click in some way, even though we're all so different. That makes my day every day.
Jonath -- I mean Greg, I was trying to make a porn joke. I guess it didn't land.
Marilyn, your "Backstreets" posts where you discuss something completely outside of film are a part of my inspiration. I thought of that and the different historical photos at "Charlie Parker..." and thought, why can't I do that?
That and the fact that I'm tired of starting a new blog every time I have a new direction I want to take. A separate photo blog? Too much trouble, I'd rather just put stuff up here.
As for the lack of recognition I just chalk it up to a certain type of high school cliquishness that Ray alludes to. I have several blogs on my blogroll that don't have me on theirs and I'm not going to delete them just because they don't want to list me. If they don't consider me a part of their in-group and thus want to exclude me, fine. But I won't exclude them. I feel stupid even thinking about it. I have too much responsibility in my life to worry about a blogroll.
And I do love our group so much. We're a fine set of bloggers and writers in my opinion and I'm happy to have befriended all of you.
Stanl... I mean, Bill. I get it now. I admit though, I didn't at first.
Greg: apropos of nothing, but given the tone of this post, I think the title "CS Blues" would be, uh, kewl... referring to Cinema Styles along with an arcane and wholly unnecessary reference to the Robert Frank film. Always keep 'em guessing.
As for "held over" ad blurbs, my all-time favorite was the Manhattan theater that showed Diva for over a year: "Diva Playing For Keeps: 62 Weeks!"
Marilyn, "they" invited Shirley and Angie Dickinson. If I were a woman and had my choice, I'd rather be Angie than Shirley any day of the week.
My blogroll has sites that I actually visit and read. I did keep a couple of links up just to be nice, but honestly, since my site is all about what I recommend to people to watch (and very rarely, what I don't), I feel my blogroll should reflect the same criteria.
As some of you know, I'm trying to find a chance to start a new feminist film blog. I don't want Ferdy to be anything else - it's just the way I want it. But the other project has been on my mind for a long time.
CS Blues. Maybe I could start another blog with that name and use a pseudon... wait a minute, what am I saying?
I like the CS Blues title too but Cinema Styles will always go by that name. It's such an utterly generic name and yet I've grown inexplicably fond of it. It says nothing much at all and so I can go anywhere I want with it.
And I can tell you in my hometown of Charleston, Diva did not play for 62 weeks. Holy crap, after 62 weeks you're entering Rocky Horror midnight movie territory.
Marilyn, I understand a blogroll reflecting tastes and I understand when they get too long they're useless so I try to keep it down to size by deleting older blogs that don't update anymore and the like. And there are some I leave off because I don't like what they say or how they say it but not many.
And I hope the feminist film blog gets going but I hope it doesn't become too much. I know from having multiple blogs it seems like a good idea at first and quickly becomes unwieldy. I'd like to see both and I know you don't want to mess with the structure of "Ferdy on Films" but maybe you could have a "Feminist Review of the Week" or the like, just for starters. To get a feel for it before christening an entirely new blog.
I'm just skimming these comments, but I can't wait to find out what Jonathan thinks of this new guy Greg. That guy can't stop blabbing! Does he think he's a name or something?!
Thanks for the advice, Greg (almost typed Jonathan there). I know it's a lot, and during low-energy weeks, like this week, even just Ferdy is a bear. (Thank GOD for Rod, who complements me in every way, especially being alert when I'm inert.)
I have thought about getting partner for the feminist film blog, too, but finding someone with the right stuff isn't that easy. I've thought about maybe limited "In Her Own Right" to one or two posts a week.
Arbo, I just love this site so much I can't stop responding to everyone's comments. Almost like it's my blog. Weird.
By the way, now you can no longer blackmail me as you have done for months by threatening to reveal my name. Although you do still have my address but you'll never reveal it. You don't have the belly for it!
You don't have the belly for it!
Ha ha-- you do, though... Fatty!
Marilyn - God, Rod. Alert, Inert. That was like a poem.
I limit The Invisible Edge to three posts a week tops, Monday, Wednesday and Friday but don't even hold myself to that all of the time. Sometimes it's twice a week and once or twice I have done a single post. But that's what keeps it going. I don't feel any pressure to constantly put up an update. As for my personal photo blog, that's about twice a week and now it will be less to none because I'll just merge it in here.
Ha ha-- you do, though... Fatty!
Okay, aside from making me laugh out loud at work (jerkwad) you know that's not true. Arbo has the great pleasure of knowing me (but not in the biblical sense) and knows that I cut quite the handsome figure. Yes, I have put on some pounds since quitting smoking but I assure you, it will come off and I will be built like a Marble statue once again. Like
David, only better equipped downstairs.
I think if you had 200 lbs. of marble hanging down below, the only better equipment you'd need is an hydraulic sling.
All kidding aside, I have a name brand in the world outside of Arbogast on Film and I've never had any trouble because of it. Whether in print or online, I've never kept my address or e-mail hidden and no one has ever reached out in a negative way.
I started AoF to get out of my own head and to focus on writing disconnected to ambition and/or networking - also to be able to write according to my own caprice rather than by assignment. It's been a great release over the past year and a half but also a drain on my regular, mortgage-paying work. It's tough to balance it all... but I don't really want to do any less than "it all."
Well, Marilyn, I can't argue that and not being Fox, I won't.
Arbo, I think you balance it all very well but I also think you could do Arbogast on Film as the namebrand you and it wouldn't make any difference to anyone. I'm not trying to push you in that direction but I'm just saying I don't think it would affect your writing as much as you think it would.
Reading all these comments, I feel like a bit of a poser. I started my blog because I thought it would be fun, not necessarily because I felt a burning need to get my thoughts on films and so forth out there. I've always written, but not this kind of stuff. I've been pleased and/or proud of some of the movie and book related stuff I've written, but the writing urge I have is geared towards fiction. I've fallen too far away from that urge in recent years, but I'm moving back, finally. Still, I don't want to post my stories on my blog. I've thought about it, but I don't want to. I guess that's part of the reason why I put up humor pieces (or "comical essays") every so often. Those are often the most satisfying things for me to write.
Bill, you're no poser: you're honest.
It just dawned on me that this whole Jonathan/"Greg" identity fiasco is unfolding shortly after Jonathan got Marilyn to send him her photograph...
Coincidence? Yeah, right.
Are you in hiding, Jonathan?
Is everything OK at home?
Is Marilyn pulling a Glenn Close?!?
Inquiring minds want to know!
I also think you could do Arbogast on Film as the namebrand you and it wouldn't make any difference to anyone.
Yeah, that's my inclination, too - or rather, I'm growing less interested in my real name writing, but to shift focus would be to make AoF my job rather than my hobby and I don't want to lose the joy of hobbying. Unless somebody were to ride in and slap a big check on my portmanteau... then I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Clears portmanteau. Sits quietly with hands folded.
Arbo - I did lose joy in a hobby when it became an obligation (writing a birding newsletter), so I would think on it before changing what you're doing.
BTW, has anyone been following the tragic turn of events in the life of Natasha Richardson. There are reports that she's braindead. I can't believe the last film of hers I saw (on Monday) was the semi-wretched Blow Dry. I'm going to watch Gothic tonight to make up for that faux pas and try to write it up tomorrow. She may be truly dead by then.
Greg -
I'm cruising through quickly on my brief lunch break, but want you to know - whatever you write, whatever your focus, I'll be here to read it. Your posts are thoughful and heartfelt and always make for illuminating reading.
As a side note -
I'm so excited that "Wild Boys of the Road" is coming out on DVD. I saw clips on a TCM sprecial on William Wellman last year and have wanted to see it ever since.
Flickhead - thank you.
Marilyn, last I heard the "brain dead" reports are wrong. She may still be doing very badly -- I don't know -- but some sources jumped the gun in a rather disgusting fashion. Time Out New York claimed yesterday that she had died. She apparently is suffering from brain swelling, which, depending on how severe and how soon the doctors were able to begin treatment, could go either way.
Marilyn -
I would love to see a feminist film blog from you - hope it comes to fruition.
Interesting, the last Nataha Richardson film I saw was "Blow Dry" as well, and yes, it's just barely passable. I was following some of the coverage on her, but have stopped because it's become so ghoulish in some quarters - some sites, including, Huff Po, have all but declared her officially dead.
Flickhead, I wrote Marilyn and told her to nix the picture. I felt bad for asking. Like saying, "Okay, if you want to do that then I want this!" Although I have no compunction against putting my own picture up here soon as I ... uh... expose myself to you guys more and more.
Marilyn, I think you're right about the hobby thing and Arbo, you probably should keep it just like it is. I'll be honest, I like what you write for publication under your real name but there is a freer more mischevous quality to your Arbo writing that seems more like the real you. Which is odd since it's not the "real" you, if you know what I mean.
Bill, if you want to put some of your own writing on your blog, why not? Your story was very good (although YOU NEVER SENT ME THE SECOND PART!!!) and that's a lot of what this is all about: Not feeling obligated to do just one thing because that's how we've defined ourselves. We can re-define ourselves anytime we like.
Pat - Thank you so much. I'm so glad to hear you like what I write here no matter what the name.
And Pat (and everyone else), I haven't been following the news on Richardson aside from the initial news and then feeling quite sad about it. I have always liked her (and her whole family) so much. I haven't followed much because I don't like the ghoulish nature Pat speaks of.
I like what you write for publication under your real name but there is a freer more mischevous quality to your Arbo writing that seems more like the real you. Which is odd since it's not the "real" you
But it is, actually. My professional persona is affected, studied (somewhat) and a game face, while AoF rejects the game (however much I may claim to love it) to gas on uninhibited.
I need both.
Greg (that's still weird!), sorry about never sending you the second part. If you remember, at the time the story was incomplete (that's no longer the case!), and I think that had something to do with my hesitation. As for posting on my blog, though, I haven't even taken a stab at getting the thing published yet, and when/if I do that, if it were already available for free on a blog, I think my chances of succeeding in that endeavor would be greatly diminished.
And who the hell is Arbogast in the real world?? You guys are driving me crazy with these secrets!!
But it is, actually. My professional persona is affected, studied (somewhat) and a game face
No, I know, I just meant it's odd because the real you shines through more under the pseudonym than under your real byline. It probably is good to have both.
And by the way, everyone, I commented on Arbo's blog as Greg a couple of times as a joke where I would talk about how great Lapper's ideas were and then Arbo would totally disparage Lapper. Oh, those heady merry prankster days are gone forever. But we sure had a good time didn't we?
Also, and I've revealed this before, I've put myself in banners before too. Now I have no need for such simple and pleasurable mischief. Sigh.
Bill, didn't you post the story at the lit forum? What would be so different about posting it at your blog, in regards to eventual publication?
And no one bother to ask who Arbo is cause that fish won't swim, if you know what I mean.
OMG, Greg, I knew Italians were a bit on the hairy side, but you look JUST LIKE Toto!
Yeah, but I never posted the whole thing, and anyway I now regret posting what I had on that forum. I've thought about asking them to delete it.
Arbogast, who are you, really?
but you look JUST LIKE Toto!
And who knew I was only 10 inches tall?
I could tell your height just by the way you posted. Your letters looked small.
And please take those diving weights off Arbo so he can swim again.
Bill, why the regret? Did someone make some nasty comments or something? And don't bug Arbo. I don't want people to start guessing and make it all uncomfortable. And you wouldn't want me to reveal your last name is Rasputin would you? Cause I will and I... oops. Sorry.
Seriously though, what happened on the forum?
And send me the rest of the story!
Here's a concept for a blogathon: on the same day, everyone posts a recent photograph of themself.
We know what Peter looks like, and Kim Morgan, and a handful of others, but the rest...? Could be quite an eyeful.
Nothing happened on the forum. I only got one (1) comment for my efforts, but I more regret it being out there in the public for anyone to copy and paste, or whatever people do.
I will send you the story...
I no longer care who Arbogast is.
PS - Where the hell is Fox today? And Rick?
Flickhead - That's a good idea, but there's one drawback: I look like a douche.
Flickhead - I'd participate, but I don't want Helen Mirren to stop getting calls for those hot, middle-age women roles. I don't act for a living.
Flickhead, I like that but let's wait a couple of months so I can get fully back up to speed after quitting smoking in the dead of winter and subsequently falling apart. But I have some from a few months ago. Actually, I only have about three or four total because I'm always the one taking the pictures in the family.
PS - Where the hell is Fox today? And Rick?
Probably doing something stupid like work. Now that I'm me I'm going to start calling Fox by his name, Mark, until he finally reveals his last name.
Is that really Fox's first name? Because he acts like a "Mark".
Marilyn, I have removed the weights. Arbo is free.
Flickhead, I just remembered you put up your pick a while ago. Two in fact. One at the prom and another of you sitting down smoking a cigarette.
And Rick we know. He looks like Boudu.
Bill, I'm taking him at his word. His said his name was Mark, so for now, I'll believe him.
I know Fox's last name. Is it really a secret?
PS: Ed Howard is a pseudonym. As long as we're revealing secrets, I can at last tell you all that my real name is Rick Moranis.
I know Mark's last name, too, but it came out of the blue. I got an email from someone named Mark ____ asking to do a discussion on women in the film business on our respective blogs. I was, "Who the hell is this?" until I figured out it was Fox.
I know Fox's last name. Is it really a secret?
It is to me, I have no idea what it is.
And is your name really a pseudonym? I mean, I know it's not Rick Moranis, but is "Ed Howard" a pen name?
Also, when you bend over, do people say, "Look! It's Howard's End."
I was, "Who the hell is this?" until I figured out it was Fox.
Why is it funny to me that Fox would send out an e-mail under his real name and not explain to the recipients who it was from? Perhaps because it seems so... Fox.
I think I'll change my name to Wyle E. Coyote, SooooperGenius.
Greg, quitting smoking is a bitch, but well worth the effort. I had my last cigarette on January 9, 1988 after smoking for fifteen years, and there's no way I'd ever start again.
I'm sure if I inhaled "just to see" what it's like, I'd be back up to two packs a day within a week. And, quite frankly, at current prices, the Flickhead's fixed income wouldn't be enough to foot the addiction.
(If my memory's right, a carton of Marlboros was up to $10.00 when I quit, and back then I felt that that was outrageous.)
If it'll make you feel any better, I was a raw nerve for the first few months.
Flickhead, until I went to a quitting smokers site online I really thought I was a hopeless case. I had always heard after the first three days it gets easier. Well after three weeks I was jonesing for a cigarette just as strongly as the first day I quit. Almost three full months later and I STILL get a strong, very strong urge for a smoke at least two or three times a day.
So anyway, the site revealed to me that for most heavily addicted smokers it does takes months to finally rid yourself of the strong urges and that small ones will remain, off and on, for most of your life.
I know I could go back to full pack a day habit in minutes!
So far, that thought alone has scared me enough (along with thoughts of stroke, heart attack, throat cancer, lung cancer, etc) to keep me off of them.
I love disease talk!
If Fox doesn't care that people know his name, then you should all just tell me. It'll probably turn out that I used to go to high school with him.
Marilyn, I found out Fox's name pretty much the same way, and had pretty much the same thought process when I got an e-mail from Mark ____: Who the hell is that? Oh, it's Fox.
And no, I blog under my real name. I've made music under various assumed names, but I've always written with my actual name.
Hey, how come Bill and I didn't get this e-mail from Fox?
What the hell's up with that Mark... uh... Wahlberg! Why the cold shoulder for Bill and I?
Or maybe I thought it was junk mail and deleted it.
I've never had an assumed name, unless you count taking my ex-husband's name when we married (which I did for somewhat professional reasons - I was on the board of the Chicago Audubon Society and his last name was Hawker). I used a moniker when I first started posting around the internet, but thought it would be harder for people to flame me if I wasn't completely anonymous (and, actually, that turned out to be true).
I used to smoke. I quit cold turkey, and the first 2 weeks were rough. But that was good because it's a memory I keep of something I never want to go through again.
Ed, are you on Soundclick? I just signed up last month and put up a paltry three pieces, the only three I had on my computer.
Greg, for me, my inherent defect of self-loathing came in quite handy: I just used nicotine withdrawal as an extension of masochism. I stopped drinking coffee for the first few months (hugely inadvisable unless you're crazy) because it was such a trigger for the morning smoke. I was chowing down on Chips Ahoy and Haagen Dazs faster than they could manufacture the stuff. It was complete lunacy. I'm 5'10" and weighed close to 240 during that period.
But time changes things. Now I'm under 170 and jog 5 miles three or four days a week. My one addiction, other than free online porn and intensive masturbation, is coffee.
I used to smoke. I quit cold turkey, and the first 2 weeks were rough. But that was good because it's a memory I keep of something I never want to go through again.
I quit cold turkey too (chewed Nicorette for a couple of days then stopped. It's useless.) and that's exactly how I feel. It's a memory I want to keep close to me, just how rough it was in case I'm ever thinking, "Oh I'll just have one."
Flickhead, I completely failed on my first try. The first week of January I quit and three days later attended a party for a friend. Well, within 30 minutes (the party was at a club downtown) I had bought a pack of cigarettes. About a week later, I quit cold turkey, again, and so far, three months later, it's stuck. But I have put on some weight!
I knew a guy who smoked 3-5 packs a day AND ran 7 miles a day. And he wanted to be Jewish. Talk about a masochist!
I knew a guy who smoked 3-5 packs a day AND ran 7 miles a day. And he wanted to be Jewish.
I just got an Xbox.
Greg, never even heard of Soundclick until just now. Looking at it, I can't imagine which of those genre categories I'd post my tracks in; there's nowhere for experimental or avant-garde music. I've always just released my stuff, in small quantities, through my label, though it's been inactive for a while now.
I totally understand the need to switch things up Jo... Greg!
I've really been itching to write about new and current films I watch so when I make the changes I've been slowly working on for Cinebeats, I may decided to make room for that.
I'd also love to turn Cinebeats into a group blog like the Charlie Parker blog I contribute to or at least accept contributions on occasion. But I'm sure others are already too busy with their own blogs to want to contribute to Cinebeats and I'm kind of particular about the films I like to cover there. Who knows, but I need more time for other things and I'd like Cinebeats to be more active.
Good luck with the changes!
As for the pseudonym, I used the name of "Eva" (my grandmother's middle name) when I wrote for music mags because I liked the anonymity and it had a dark/goth feel and yes, I was a "darkling" in my teens/twenties. Now I'm just me. My full name is Kimberly Merlo-Lindbergs (Merlo being my maiden name) but I prefer using my married name because I just like the sound of it.
p.s. my husband has a SoundlClick page as well. He's listed under "Instrumentals Electro-hop" and you can find him here.
I can't imagine which of those genre categories I'd post my tracks in; there's nowhere for experimental or avant-garde music.
Ed, I put my stuff under those very categories you mentioned. There's all kind of categories to put your stuff in. It's a great resource. Your stuff gets licensed and copyrighted and you decide on the contractual agreements if anyone wants to use your tracks and so on. Give it a try.
Kimberly, I've looked at your other sites including your photo/personal blog and I think you should combine that with Cinebeats (he says as he desperately tries to get everyone else to mix up their blogs along with him). I have so many different things going I feel like consolidating, hence putting up the archival photos and my own here.
And I'm going to check out your husband's Soundclick page. I'd give you the link to mine but I only have three pieces up right now and want to wait to I have a good selection to scroll through. Then I'll link it on my sidebar.
Kimberly, I've looked at your other sites including your photo/personal blog and I think you should combine that with Cinebeats (he says as he desperately tries to get everyone else to mix up their blogs along with him)
I'm in the process of making changes to all my sites/blogs.
I plan to combine my personal blog with my personal website at kimberlylindbergs.com since I'm currently looking for work. It will probably become more design/graphic focused since I plan to offer my blog/web/twitter design services. Soon I will also have a gallery there with my photography and art, but at the moment I just use Flickr.
I don't want my hobby sites to crossover too much with work related stuff, but I hope to find a better way to combine things or at least mix them up a bit more.
Kimberly, I certainly hope that all works out well for you. I'm sure any design services for blogs and websites would go over well. You've got a great eye for it.
Re-designs are always exciting to me. I think you can tell when a person has a penchant for graphic design in them when they just can't stop changing the look of their world. I do it with the house we rent and with my sites online. And I love doing it for other people too. I feel like you're the same way, being a multiple blog/flickr/photographer person too.
Kimberly, Do you know Movable Type coding and design?
I didn't know Jonathan hardly at all, but it is very nice to meet you Greg. I've been enjoying the historical interludes you've been posting, your enthusiasm comes through in your writing and I look forward to whatever form Cinema Styles takes.
I feel like you're the same way, being a multiple blog/flickr/photographer person too.
Totally agree! It seems like you have a creative home life.
My husband and I both come from families with artistic urges. My dad liked to draw and played the sax. My mom always talked about books she wanted to write, but sadly never did and of course my father-in-law was a respected poet and stage actor so our own artistic urges shouldn't be much of a surprise.
I used to enjoy playing the piano and synths a lot myself, but I'm more drawn to writing, photography design and digital art/college now. I only wish there were more hours in each day so I could do everything I enjoy doing more fully instead of so half-assed.
Marilyn, I'll send you an email!
Marilyn, If only I could've gotten that redesign to work all that time ago. Maybe Kimberly can help you out. I hope so.
Kassy, thanks. That's very nice of you to say. I'm glad I made the switch now and didn't wait another two years when the name Jonathan was so ingrained in everyone's head it would have been impossible to shake.
Kimberly, that's my problem too - I don't have enough time for all of it and it's frustrating. I want to work on a movie, but then I want to write, but then I want work on some photos I've taken, but then I need to record some music while a melody is still fresh in my head, but then... Aaaaarrggghhh!!!
So long story short, I'm still looking for that magical billionaire benefactor who will pad my bank account so I can just do this stuff all day long.
Bill, I totally missed your comment until just now.
I sincerely hope that x-box works out for you. You'll be in my thoughts.
I always thought there was something unreal about the name Lapper! Nice to have my suspicions validated, for once.
Ryan - Yeah, Lapper. It is kind of unreal isn't it? Before I started Cinema Styles there was this real estate lawyer in New York named Jonathan Lapper that would come up in google searches but then I started this up and he's dropped off the front page. Maybe now he can finally regain his place at the top.
So, I go away from the computer for a day and there's no more Jonathan Lapper. What next? Will I leave for a week and find out there's no Santa?
And what kind of name is Ferrara, anyway?
But I think this post is some of the strongest writing I've seen you do. And as someone who knows his self-loathing, I'm proud to know you, whatever your name is.
Rick, just caught this before heading off to bed. First, thank you for the compliment on the writing. I appreciate that.
Second, Ferrara is, believe it or not, Eye-Tallion, or as some people say, Italian. Take a wild guess what Northern Italian city my great grandfather came from?
And I'm proud to know you too. I promise to you and all here, this is my real name - It won't be changed again!
Greg: Maybe now he can finally regain his place at the top.
How do you think he would feel knowing he was dethroned by a fake Jonathan Lapper?
Just for the record, there's certainly nothing wrong with using a pseudonym, but I'm glad it's gotten to the point where you can put your name on the internet comfortably, without thinking "now I'm gonna have rapists at my front door"
Though, in my case, there are so many Ryan Kelly's in this country that it hardly matters. At least three of my friends known someone else named Ryan Kelly, which I'll admit makes me extremely jealous. Maybe I should use a pseudonym.
You're the only Ryan Kelly I've ever known but if you want to use a pseudonym Jonathan Lapper is now in the public domain.
Greg: I recommend Hiroshi Shimizu's Mr. Thank You, made in 1936. A Japanese sound movie shot on location, it basically follows a cross-section of Japanese people on a bus ride in a relatively remote section of Japan. In a certain way, it is an interesting comparison to It Happened One Night, only it's more pictorial.
Greg F. huh? Well... I can get used to that. It will be a little bit like your brother telling you he's always had a feeling inside him that makes him want to be your "sister", but... I'm fine with that.
Actually. It's not like that at all. Welcome Greg F.!
Sincerely,
(uh hum...) Fox
Peter, that would interest me as well because it was made as tensions mounted leading just a year later to the Sino-Japanese War that went on until the end of WWII. Any mention of tensions with China in the movie? Probably not but just curious.
Fox - Scan the comments (or use edit/find on "Fox") because we talked about your name thing and how you sent out an e-mail (but apparently not to Bill and me) that had your real name, Mark and your last name. Since Bill and I now feel shunned and left out how about an email with your full name so we feel better. Thanks.
Your brother "sister,"
Greg
You're the only Ryan Kelly I've ever known but if you want to use a pseudonym Jonathan Lapper is now in the public domain.
That's a kind offer, but those are some big shoes to fill. It's a task I'm probably not up to. I'm happy being Ryan Kelly.
Ryan, if you're happy, I'm happy.
Greg -
You can easily find out my name if you look at my e-mail address. Well, you can easily find out the last initial.
And then if you still want to know, you just have to e-mail me and when I respond it will have my full name. And Bill R. should know since we had an e-mail exchange once!
It's not intended to be a secret, I just don't want family members finding my blog, b/c if they did, I would delete it. I can handle a lot, but I can't handle my mom reading my blog.
To make it entertaining, I will say that my last name is the same as a famous rocker frontman.
It's not intended to be a secret, I just don't want family members finding my blog, b/c if they did, I would delete it. I can handle a lot, but I can't handle my mom reading my blog.
Especially with your post up today. I understand completely. I'm so different from my family in tastes and preferences they'd probably find the whole thing bizarre if I told them.
To make it entertaining, I will say that my last name is the same as a famous rocker frontman.
Thank you Mr. Daltry, a pleasure to meet you. Anyway, I don't feel like going through the whole e-mail process so let me just ask: I saw the initial, so would it be the Black Sabbath frontman? If it's not that I'll just e-mail you.
I saw the initial, so would it be the Black Sabbath frontman?
You are correct!!!
And, for the record, y'all can call me whatever you want... Mark, Fox, Fark, Mox... just don't call me Ozzy!
But the main thing with my family is that I don't have any desire to breach that wall with them over movies, etc. For example, my mom will call me, and since she knows I like movies, will say, "Hi, Honey. I saw that Revolutionary Road movie. It was well done. I liked it. What did you think?" Well... I ain't argue with my mom over a movie, especially when she is actively making an effort to take interest in something I enjoy. So, I just say, "Yeah. It was good. Leo is cute."
People may say that is dishonest or pompous. Whatevs. I'm just not interested in spending the time I have with my mom arguing about movies. That's what I have you geeks for!!
People may say that is dishonest or pompous. Whatevs.
Ozz... oops, Fox, that's not dishonest (well, I guess it is but in a good way) at all. I do that all the time. When people find out you like movies they immediately bombard you with mediocrity, saying they like this or that movie that you know to be underwhelming. And when that happens I usually just shoot back, "Yeah that was pretty good."
Hell, man, I've written posts on this subject before (although I can't remember the title of the post). We all do it. We avoid arguing with our family and co-workers and friends because we don't want to offend them and more importantly (and quite egotistically, but it's inescapable) we know they don't, uh..., you know... they don't know as much about movies so why bother. Yikes. But it's the truth.
Greg-
So do you think when I ask Bill, "Hey Bill, do you like my blog?" and he says, "Oh yeah, it's pretty neat and good!", that he's really just blowing smoke up my shorts?
Yeah. I rememeber those posts (I think you had more than one??). One new twist to that phenomenon is that my dad just finally got Netflix. I'm hoping he doesn't try to add me as a friend b/c that would just be too weird. "Son, how could you give The Bourne Ultimatum one star and Juno two stars?!?". I prefer the conversations my dad and I have about baseball.
"Son, how could you give The Bourne Ultimatum one star and Juno two stars?!?".
Yeah, it's impossible to explain to my mother, father or sister why the movie they think is good sucks and why the great movie they don't like proves they're movie idiots (but not general idiots you understand). My brother is kind of half way there. Kind of. He sort of gets greatness in film but still gravitates more towards the big Oscar stuff than anything else.
I never rate stuff on Netflix. My Netflix buddy must think I suck.
I'm sure he's more enlightened than that. Fatty.
Okay, yeah, you're my Netflix buddy. I'm going to inundate you with plot summaries and comments again like I did when we first became buds.
Switching my mind from blog buddy Jonathan to blog buddy Greg is easy enough. I've gotta say, though, I always kind of enjoyed saying "Lapper" in my mind like you were an arch-nemesis. I don't know what I'll do with that.
You could say, "Ferrara." It's kinda the same. Sort of. I guess.
Maybe not. Just call me Greg here but Lapper in your mind. There, that solves it.
Post a Comment